Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Silvia Zanon
Based on 8 articles published since 2010
(Why 8 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, S. Zanon wrote the following 8 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Review Chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer: Efficacy, feasibility and future perspectives. 2019

Macchini, Marina / Chiaravalli, Marta / Zanon, Silvia / Peretti, Umberto / Mazza, Elena / Gianni, Luca / Reni, Michele. ·Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. Electronic address: reni.michele@hsr.it. ·Cancer Treat Rev · Pubmed #30414985.

ABSTRACT: By 2030 70% of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will occur in older adults. Elderly patients, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as people older than 65 years, represent a heterogeneous group with different biological and functional characteristics that need personalized anticancer treatments. Since older patients are under-represented in randomized phase III trials, their management is mostly extrapolated from studies performed in younger patients, without robust evidence-based recommendations. However, data from retrospective studies and case-control series show that elderly may benefit from chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Although with discordant results, gemcitabine-based treatment and dose-adapted fluorouracil combination regimens seem to be effective and well tolerated in this subset of patients. A proper balance of potential treatment benefits and side effects represent the crucial point for managing elderly patients with PDAC. Therefore an appropriate patient selection is essential to maximize the therapeutic benefit in the older population: randomized studies aiming to better standardizing fitness parameters and implementing the routine use of comprehensive geriatric assessments are strongly warranted. In this light, the detection of molecular prognostic markers able to detect patients who may benefit more from oncological treatments should be a primary endpoint of age-focused clinical trials. Altogether, the field of geriatric oncology will expand in the next years, and the clinical management of elderly patients affected by PDAC will become a major public health issue.

2 Review Biomarker-driven and molecularly targeted therapies for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 2018

Zhen, David B / Coveler, Andrew / Zanon, Silvia / Reni, Michele / Chiorean, E Gabriela. ·Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. · Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: reni.michele@hsr.it. · Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: gchiorea@uw.edu. ·Semin Oncol · Pubmed #30391013.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a deadly disease with few effective treatment options. Our knowledge of molecular alterations in PDAC has significantly grown and helped identify new therapeutic targets. The success of immune checkpoint inhibition in mismatch repair deficient tumors, PARP inhibitors for tumors with DNA repair defects, and targeting hyaluronan with PEGPH20 in patients with high expressing (hyaluronan-high) tumors are examples of promising biomarker-driven therapies. We review the major biological mechanisms in PDAC and discuss current and future directions for molecularly targeted therapies in this disease.

3 Clinical Trial Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine with or without capecitabine and cisplatin in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PACT-19): a randomised phase 2 trial. 2018

Reni, Michele / Zanon, Silvia / Peretti, Umberto / Chiaravalli, Marta / Barone, Diletta / Pircher, Chiara / Balzano, Gianpaolo / Macchini, Marina / Romi, Silvia / Gritti, Elena / Mazza, Elena / Nicoletti, Roberto / Doglioni, Claudio / Falconi, Massimo / Gianni, Luca. ·Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: reni.michele@hsr.it. · Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. · Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. ·Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol · Pubmed #30220407.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Current treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma includes combination chemotherapy, such as FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. We investigated the activity of a novel four-drug regimen, consisting of cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine, compared with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, in the PACT-19 trial. METHODS: This single-centre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial was done in San Raffaele Hospital in Italy. We enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with pathologically confirmed stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had received no previous chemotherapy and had Karnofsky performance status of at least 70. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated permutated block randomisation (block size of four) stratified by baseline concentration of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 to PAXG (cisplatin 30 mg/m FINDINGS: Between April 22, 2014, and May 30, 2016, we randomly assigned 83 patients to treatment: 42 patients to PAXG and 41 patients to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. At 6 months, 31 (74%, 95% CI 58-86) of 42 patients in the PAXG group were alive and free from disease progression compared with 19 (46%, 31-63) of 41 patients in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (12 [29%] of 42 in the PAXG group vs 14 [34%] of 41 in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group), anaemia (nine [21%] vs nine [22%]), and fatigue (seven [17%] vs seven [17%]). The most common grade 4 adverse event was neutropenia (five [12%] in the PAXG group vs two [5%] in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group). Two (5%) treatment-related deaths occurred in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group compared with none in the PAXG group. INTERPRETATION: Despite the small sample size, our findings suggest that the PAXG regimen warrants further investigation in a phase 3 trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Celgene.

4 Clinical Trial A randomised phase 2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine with or without capecitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 2018

Reni, Michele / Zanon, Silvia / Balzano, Gianpaolo / Passoni, Paolo / Pircher, Chiara / Chiaravalli, Marta / Fugazza, Clara / Ceraulo, Domenica / Nicoletti, Roberto / Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio / Macchini, Marina / Peretti, Umberto / Castoldi, Renato / Doglioni, Claudio / Falconi, Massimo / Partelli, Stefano / Gianni, Luca. ·Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. Electronic address: reni.michele@hsr.it. · Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy. · Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy. ·Eur J Cancer · Pubmed #30149366.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The current trial assessed whether the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine backbone is feasible and active against borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHOD: Fifty-four chemo-naive patients, aged between 18 and 75 years, with a pathological diagnosis of locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC were randomised to receive either nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin and oral capecitabine (PAXG; arm A; N = 26) or nab-paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine (AG; arm B; N = 28). The primary end-point was the tumour resection rate. If at least four such resections were performed, the treatment was considered as active. The secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours response rate, Hartman's pathologic response, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 response rate and toxicity. RESULTS: Eight patients (31%) in the PAXG arm and nine (32%) in the AG arm underwent resection. PFS at 1-year was 58% in arm A and 39% in arm B. OS at 18-month was 69% in arm A and 54% in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase II study, the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the AG backbone was feasible and yielded promising results in terms of disease control without detrimental impact on tolerability. The approach warrants further investigation in a phase III study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01730222.

5 Clinical Trial Safety and efficacy of preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PACT-15): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 trial. 2018

Reni, Michele / Balzano, Gianpaolo / Zanon, Silvia / Zerbi, Alessandro / Rimassa, Lorenza / Castoldi, Renato / Pinelli, Domenico / Mosconi, Stefania / Doglioni, Claudio / Chiaravalli, Marta / Pircher, Chiara / Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio / Torri, Valter / Maggiora, Paola / Ceraulo, Domenica / Falconi, Massimo / Gianni, Luca. ·Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: reni.michele@hsr.it. · Department of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy. · Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy. · Onco-Hematology Department, Oncology Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy. · Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pathology Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. · Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · IRCCS Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy. · Department of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. ·Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol · Pubmed #29625841.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are known to metastasise early and a rationale exists for the investigation of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable disease. We aimed to assess the role of combination chemotherapy in this setting in the PACT-15 trial. METHODS: We did this randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 trial in ten hospitals in Italy. We report the phase 2 part here. Patients aged 18-75 years who were previously untreated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, with Karnofsky performance status of more than 60, and pathologically confirmed stage I-II resectable disease were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), with a minimisation algorithm that stratified treatment allocation by centre and concentrations of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9 ≤5 × upper limit of normal [ULN] vs >5 × ULN), to receive surgery followed by adjuvant gemcitabine 1000 mg/m FINDINGS: Between Oct 5, 2010, and May 30, 2015, 93 patients were randomly allocated to treatment. One centre was found to be non-compliant with the protocol, and all five patients at this centre were excluded from the study. Thus, 88 patients were included in the final study population: 26 in group A, 30 in group B, and 32 in group C. In the per-protocol population, six (23%, 95% CI 7-39) of 30 patients in group A were event-free at 1 year, as were 15 (50%, 32-68) of 30 in group B and 19 (66%, 49-83) of 29 in group C. The main grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (five [28%] of 18 in group A, eight [38%] of 21 in group B, eight [28%] of 29 in group C before surgery, and ten [48%] of 21 in group C after surgery), anaemia (one [6%] in group A, four [19%] in group B, eight [28%] in group C before surgery, and five [24%] in group C after surgery), and fatigue (one [6%] in group A, three [14%] in group B, two [7%] in group C before surgery, and one [5%] in group C after surgery). The main grade 4 toxicity reported was neutropenia (two [11%] in group A, four [19%] in group B, none in group C). Febrile neutropenia was observed in one patient (3%) before surgery in group C. No treatment-related deaths were observed. INTERPRETATION: Our results provide evidence of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Since the trial began, the standard of care for adjuvant therapy has altered, and other chemotherapy regimens developed. Thus, we decided to not continue with the phase 3 part of the PACT-15. We are planning a phase 3 trial of this approach with different chemotherapy regimens. FUNDING: PERLAVITA ONLUS and MyEverest ONLUS.

6 Clinical Trial Phase 1B trial of Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, capecitabine, and cisplatin (PAXG regimen) in patients with unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 2016

Reni, Michele / Balzano, Gianpaolo / Zanon, Silvia / Passoni, Paolo / Nicoletti, Roberto / Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio / Pepe, Gino / Doglioni, Claudio / Fugazza, Clara / Ceraulo, Domenica / Falconi, Massimo / Gianni, Luca. ·Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Radiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Department of Gastroenterology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Nuclear Medicine Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Pathology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. ·Br J Cancer · Pubmed #27404453.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination significantly improved overall survival over gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A phase 1b trial was performed (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01730222) to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of nab-paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, capecitabine, and gemcitabine at fixed dose (800, 30, and 1250 mg m(-2) every 2 weeks, respectively; PAXG regimen). METHODS: Nab-paclitaxel doses were escalated from 100 (level one) to 125 (level two) and 150 mg m(-2) (level three) every 2 weeks in cohorts of 3-6 patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Between Dec 2012 and Apr 2014, 24 patients were enroled (3 at level one, 5 at level two, 16 at level three) and received 117 cycles of PAXG. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred and level three was the RP2D. At this dose, nab-paclitaxel dose-intensity was 91%. Worse per patient grade 3/4 toxicity were neutropenia 25/31%; fatigue 19%; anaemia and hand-foot syndrome 12%, nausea 6%, and febrile neutropenia 6%. A partial response (PR) was observed in 16 (67%) and stable disease (SD) in 8 patients (33%). Among 21 patients with a baseline positive positron emission tomography (PET) scan, a complete metabolic response was observed in 9 (43%), PR in 10 (48%), SD in 2. CA19-9 decreased by ⩾49% in all the 19 patients with elevated basal value. Six patients were resected after chemotherapy. Progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) was 96%. CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D of nab-paclitaxel in the PAXG regimen was 150 mg m(-2) every 2 weeks. The preliminary results are promising and warrant further exploration.

7 Article Selecting patients for resection after primary chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 2017

Reni, M / Zanon, S / Balzano, G / Nobile, S / Pircher, C C / Chiaravalli, M / Passoni, P / Arcidiacono, P G / Nicoletti, R / Crippa, S / Slim, N / Doglioni, C / Falconi, M / Gianni, L. ·Department of Oncology. · Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center. · Department of Radiotherapy. · Department of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS. · Department of Radiology. · Department of Pathology, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan. · Department of Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. ·Ann Oncol · Pubmed #28945895.

ABSTRACT: Background: Patients with borderline (BL) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma are usually treated with primary chemotherapy (CT), followed by resection when feasible. Scanty data are available about the criteria to candidate patients to resection after CT. Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2016 overall 223 patients diagnosed with BL or LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma were primarily treated with Gemcitabine combination (4-drugs or nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine) for 3-6 months followed by surgery and/or chemoradiation. Resection was carried out when radical resection could be predicted by imaging studies and intraoperative findings. The prognostic value of both pre-treatment factors and treatment response was retrospectively evaluated, searching for criteria that could improve the selection of patients for surgery. Results: Median survival (MS) for the whole population was 18.3 months. Surgical resection was carried out in 61 patients; MS in resected patients was significantly longer (30.0 months) as compared with 162 non-resected patients (16.5 months) (P < 0.00001). According to response criteria, 48% had a radiological partial response, 47% a stable disease and 5% a disease progression); CA19.9 response (reduction >50%) was obtained in 77.8% of patients. Among resected patients, neither pre-treatment factors, including BL/LA distinction, nor radiological response, were able to prognosticate survival differences. Survival of resected patients having no CA19.9 response was significantly lower as compared with responders (MS 15.0 versus 31.5 months, P = 0.04), and was similar to non-responders patients that did not undergo resection (MS 10.9 months, P= 0.25). Multivariate analysis carried out on the overall population, showed that Karnofsky performance status, T3-T4 status, resection and CA19.9 response were independent prognostic factors, while radiological response, BL/LA distinction and baseline CA19.9 had not significant influence on survival. Conclusions: CA19.9 response may allow a better selection of patients who will benefit from resection after primary CT for BL or LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

8 Article Is there a role for surgical resection in patients with pancreatic cancer with liver metastases responding to chemotherapy? 2016

Crippa, S / Bittoni, A / Sebastiani, E / Partelli, S / Zanon, S / Lanese, A / Andrikou, K / Muffatti, F / Balzano, G / Reni, M / Cascinu, S / Falconi, M. ·Department of Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy. · Department of Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. · Department of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy. · Department of Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: falconi.massimo@hsr.it. ·Eur J Surg Oncol · Pubmed #27423449.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: New chemotherapeutic regimens have improved survival for stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and occasionally major response of liver metastases can be observed. Aim of this work is to analyze the outcomes of patients undergoing primary chemotherapy for liver metastases from pancreatic cancer and to evaluate the results of surgical resection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with extra-hepatic metastases, patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥3, patients undergoing supportive care alone. RESULTS: 127 patients were identified. Liver metastases were unilobar in 28.5% of patients. Chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine alone or in association with other agents (44%), oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX 8%), and cisplatin, gemcitabine plus capecitabine and epirubicin (PEXG) or capecitabine and docetaxel (PDXG) or epirubicin and fluorouracil (PEFG) (48%). 56 patients (44%) had a complete (7%) or partial response (37%). surgical resection was carried out in 11 patients (8.5%). Median overall survival was 11 months for the entire cohort and 15 months for those with partial/complete response. In this sub-group median survival was significantly longer (46 versus 11 months) for patients undergoing resection (P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of overall survival were chemotherapy with multiple agents (HR: 0.512), surgical resection (HR: 0.360), >5 liver metastases at diagnosis (HR: 3.515), and CA 19.9 reduction < 50% of baseline value (HR: 2.708). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of primary pancreatic tumor with or without residual liver disease can be considered in selected cases after primary chemotherapy and it is associated with improved survival.