Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Andrea Pietrabissa
Based on 5 articles published since 2010
(Why 5 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, A. Pietrabissa wrote the following 5 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Article Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study. 2019

Alfieri, Sergio / Butturini, Giovanni / Boggi, Ugo / Pietrabissa, Andrea / Morelli, Luca / Vistoli, Fabio / Damoli, Isacco / Peri, Andrea / Fiorillo, Claudio / Pugliese, Luigi / Ramera, Marco / De Lio, Nelide / Di Franco, Gregorio / Esposito, Alessandro / Landoni, Luca / Rosa, Fausto / Menghi, Roberta / Doglietto, Giovanni Battista / Quero, Giuseppe / Anonymous2211048. ·Fondazione Policlinico "A.Gemelli" IRCCS of Rome, CRMPG (Gemelli Pancreatic Advanced Research Center), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore of Rome, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00166, Rome, Italy. · Casa di Cura Pederzoli, Via Monte Baldo 24, 37019, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. · Chirurgia Generale Universitaria dell'Ospedale di Cisanello, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy. · Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. · Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Pancreatica, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. · Fondazione Policlinico "A.Gemelli" IRCCS of Rome, CRMPG (Gemelli Pancreatic Advanced Research Center), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore of Rome, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00166, Rome, Italy. giuseppe.quero@policlinicogemelli.it. · Digestive Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondation "A.Gemelli" Hospital of Rome, Catholic University of Sacred Hearth, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. giuseppe.quero@policlinicogemelli.it. ·Langenbecks Arch Surg · Pubmed #31055639.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery has increasingly gained popularity as a treatment of choice for pancreatectomy with encouraging initial results in robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). However, few data are available on the comparison between RDP and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Our aim, thus, is to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes as well as total costs of RDP and LDP for pNETs. METHODS: All RDPs and LDPs for pNETs performed in four referral centers from 2008 to 2016 were included. Perioperative outcomes, histopathological results, overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and total costs were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-six RDPs and 85 LDPs were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts. Operative time was 36.5 min longer in the RDP group (p = 0.009) but comparable to LDP after removing the docking time (247.9 vs 233.7 min; p = 0.6). LDP related to a lower spleen preservation rate (44.7% vs 65.3%; p < 0.0001) and higher blood loss (239.7 ± 112 vs 162.5 ± 98 cc; p < 0.0001). Advantages in operative time for RDP were documented in case of the spleen preservation procedures (265 ± 41.52 vs 291 ± 23 min; p = 0.04). Conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, and pancreatic fistula rate were similar between the two groups, as well as histopathological data, OS, and DFS. Significant advantages were evidenced for LDP regarding mean total costs (9235 (± 1935) € vs 11,226 (± 2365) €; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both RDP and LDP are safe and efficacious for pNETs treatment. However, RDP offers advantages with a higher spleen preservation rate and lower blood loss. Costs still remain the main limitation of the robotic approach.

2 Article Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study. 2019

van Hilst, Jony / de Rooij, Thijs / Klompmaker, Sjors / Rawashdeh, Majd / Aleotti, Francesca / Al-Sarireh, Bilal / Alseidi, Adnan / Ateeb, Zeeshan / Balzano, Gianpaolo / Berrevoet, Frederik / Björnsson, Bergthor / Boggi, Ugo / Busch, Olivier R / Butturini, Giovanni / Casadei, Riccardo / Del Chiaro, Marco / Chikhladze, Sophia / Cipriani, Federica / van Dam, Ronald / Damoli, Isacco / van Dieren, Susan / Dokmak, Safi / Edwin, Bjørn / van Eijck, Casper / Fabre, Jean-Marie / Falconi, Massimo / Farges, Olivier / Fernández-Cruz, Laureano / Forgione, Antonello / Frigerio, Isabella / Fuks, David / Gavazzi, Francesca / Gayet, Brice / Giardino, Alessandro / Groot Koerkamp, Bas / Hackert, Thilo / Hassenpflug, Matthias / Kabir, Irfan / Keck, Tobias / Khatkov, Igor / Kusar, Masa / Lombardo, Carlo / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Marshall, Ryne / Menon, Krish V / Montorsi, Marco / Orville, Marion / de Pastena, Matteo / Pietrabissa, Andrea / Poves, Ignaci / Primrose, John / Pugliese, Raffaele / Ricci, Claudio / Roberts, Keith / Røsok, Bård / Sahakyan, Mushegh A / Sánchez-Cabús, Santiago / Sandström, Per / Scovel, Lauren / Solaini, Leonardo / Soonawalla, Zahir / Souche, F Régis / Sutcliffe, Robert P / Tiberio, Guido A / Tomazic, Aleš / Troisi, Roberto / Wellner, Ulrich / White, Steven / Wittel, Uwe A / Zerbi, Alessandro / Bassi, Claudio / Besselink, Marc G / Abu Hilal, Mohammed / Anonymous5620925. ·Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom. · Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom. · Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, United States. · Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. · Department of General and HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. · Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. · Department of Surgery, Universitá di Pisa, Pisa, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera, Italy. · Department of Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. · Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. · Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Hospital of Beaujon, Clichy, France. · Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway. · Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. · Department of Surgery, Hopital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France. · Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. · Department of Surgery, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France. · Department of Surgery, Humanitas University Hospital, Milan, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. · Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. · Clinic for Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. · Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation. · Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. · Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. · Department of Surgery, University hospital Pavia, Pavia, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. · Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. · Surgical Clinic, Department of clinical and experimental sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. · Department of Surgery, The Freeman Hospital Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom. ·Ann Surg · Pubmed #29099399.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare oncological outcomes after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BACKGROUND: Cohort studies have suggested superior short-term outcomes of MIDP vs. ODP. Recent international surveys, however, revealed that surgeons have concerns about the oncological outcomes of MIDP for PDAC. METHODS: This is a pan-European propensity score matched study including patients who underwent MIDP (laparoscopic or robot-assisted) or ODP for PDAC between January 1, 2007 and July 1, 2015. MIDP patients were matched to ODP patients in a 1:1 ratio. Main outcomes were radical (R0) resection, lymph node retrieval, and survival. RESULTS: In total, 1212 patients were included from 34 centers in 11 countries. Of 356 (29%) MIDP patients, 340 could be matched. After matching, the MIDP conversion rate was 19% (n = 62). Median blood loss [200 mL (60-400) vs 300 mL (150-500), P = 0.001] and hospital stay [8 (6-12) vs 9 (7-14) days, P < 0.001] were lower after MIDP. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications (18% vs 21%, P = 0.431) and 90-day mortality (2% vs 3%, P > 0.99) were comparable for MIDP and ODP, respectively. R0 resection rate was higher (67% vs 58%, P = 0.019), whereas Gerota's fascia resection (31% vs 60%, P < 0.001) and lymph node retrieval [14 (8-22) vs 22 (14-31), P < 0.001] were lower after MIDP. Median overall survival was 28 [95% confidence interval (CI), 22-34] versus 31 (95% CI, 26-36) months (P = 0.929). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable survival was seen after MIDP and ODP for PDAC, but the opposing differences in R0 resection rate, resection of Gerota's fascia, and lymph node retrieval strengthen the need for a randomized trial to confirm the oncological safety of MIDP.

3 Article An innovative strategy for the identification and 3D reconstruction of pancreatic cancer from CT images. 2016

Marconi, S / Pugliese, L / Del Chiaro, M / Pozzi Mucelli, R / Auricchio, F / Pietrabissa, A. ·Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. stefania.marconi@unipv.it. · I.R.C.C.S Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Karolinska Institutet, Stochkolm, Sweden. · Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. ·Updates Surg · Pubmed #27605209.

ABSTRACT: We propose an innovative tool for Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma 3D reconstruction from Multi-Detector-Computed Tomography. The tumor mass is discriminated from health tissue, and the resulting segmentation labels are rendered preserving information on different hypodensity levels. The final 3D virtual model includes also pancreas and main peri-pancreatic vessels, and it is suitable for 3D printing. We performed a preliminary evaluation of the tool effectiveness presenting ten cases of Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma processed with the tool to an expert radiologist who can correct the result of the discrimination. In seven of ten cases, the 3D reconstruction is accepted without any modification, while in three cases, only 1.88, 5.13, and 5.70 %, respectively, of the segmentation labels are modified, preliminary proving the high effectiveness of the tool.

4 Article Hepatoid carcinoma of the pancreas with lymphoid stroma: first description of the clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of an unusual pancreatic carcinoma. 2015

Vanoli, Alessandro / Argenti, Francesca / Vinci, Alessio / La Rosa, Stefano / Viglio, Alessandra / Riboni, Roberta / Necchi, Vittorio / Pugliese, Luigi / Sessa, Fausto / Pietrabissa, Andrea / Paulli, Marco. ·Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, ale.vanol@virgilio.it. ·Virchows Arch · Pubmed #25989715.

ABSTRACT: We report a case of tumour in the head of the pancreas observed in a 57-year-old man with a history of worsening jaundice and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) serum level, who underwent Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy. Histologically, the tumour was predominantly composed of solid sheets of large eosinophilic cells with a prominent lymphoid infiltration without association neither with DNA microsatellite instability nor Epstein-Barr virus infection. The tumour was diffusely and strongly positive for hepatocyte paraffin-1 (Hep Par-1) and glypican-3 leading to the diagnosis of hepatoid carcinoma. Strong cytoplasmic staining for AFP was focally observed. Moreover, tumour cells showed countless cytoplasmic eosinophilic globules immunoreactive for the stress protein p62. A primary hepatocellular carcinoma of the liver was ruled out by careful clinical analysis. Hepatoid carcinoma is an extremely rare pancreatic neoplasm, and here, we describe the first case of such variant associated with lymphoid stroma. The characteristic histologic features and the immunophenotypic profile help in distinguishing this carcinoma from other pancreatic tumours, notably from medullary carcinoma.

5 Article Growth hormone-releasing hormone-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 family with an uncommon phenotype. 2013

Sala, Elisa / Ferrante, Emanuele / Verrua, Elisa / Malchiodi, Elena / Mantovani, Giovanna / Filopanti, Marcello / Ferrero, Stefano / Pietrabissa, Andrea / Vanoli, Alessandro / La Rosa, Stefano / Zatelli, Maria C / Beck-Peccoz, Paolo / Verga, Uberta. ·Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. elisasala@yahoo.it ·Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol · Pubmed #23542451.

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to describe a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) family characterized by primary hyperparathyroidism, in association with acromegaly because of ectopic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion by a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in a young man and with a bronchial carcinoid in his mother. We investigate the clinical, radiological imaging, histopathologic findings, and therapy. An 18-year-old man successfully underwent subtotal parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. A subsequent genetic analysis showed a MEN1 gene mutation. Three years later, acromegaly because of ectopic GHRH secretion was diagnosed (pituitary MRI negative and elevated GHRH levels). A search for an ectopic tumor was unsuccessful and somatostatin analog therapy was started. Successively, scintigraphy with somatostatin analogs (68-Ga-DOTATOC-PET) showed three focal areas in the pancreatic tail. Distal pancreatectomy showed multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and hormonal status was normalized. Afterwards, the evaluation of the patient's mother, carrying the same mutation, indicated a primary hyperparathyroidism and a 4 cm lung mass. The patient underwent subtotal pneumonectomy and the histological analysis was consistent with the diagnosis of a typical bronchial carcinoid. In conclusion, an atypical phenotype may be recorded in MEN1 families, thus emphasizing the importance of the new imaging and surgical techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of such a rare disease.