Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Teresa Lucia Pan
Based on 2 articles published since 2010
(Why 2 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, Teresa Lucia Pan wrote the following 2 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Review Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-interventional treatment with radiofrequency ablation/irreversible electroporation. 2018

Paiella, Salvatore / De Pastena, Matteo / D'Onofrio, Mirko / Crinò, Stefano Francesco / Pan, Teresa Lucia / De Robertis, Riccardo / Elio, Giovanni / Martone, Enrico / Bassi, Claudio / Salvia, Roberto. ·General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, Verona, Italy. · Radiology Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, Verona, Italy. · Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, Verona, Italy. · Radiology Unit, Ospedale Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. ·Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol · Pubmed #30505967.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a solid tumor with still a dismal prognosis. Diagnosis is usually late, when the disease is metastatic or locally advanced (LAPC). Only 20% of PC are amenable to surgery at the time of diagnosis and the vast majority of them, despite radically resected will unavoidably recur. The treatment of LAPC is a challenge. Current guidelines suggest to adopt systemic therapies upfront, based on multi-drugs chemotherapy regimens. However, the vast majority of patients will never experience conversion to surgical exploration and radical resection. Thus, there a large subgroup of LAPC patients where the only therapeutic chance is to offer palliative treatments, such as interventional ablative treatments, in order to obtain a cytoreduction of the tumor, trying to delay its growth and spread. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and irreversible electroporation (IRE) demonstrated to be safe and effective in obtaining a local control of the disease with some promising oncological results in terms of overall survival (OS). However, they should be adopted as a treatment strategy to adopt in parallel with other systemic therapies, within multidisciplinary choices. They are not free from complications, even serious, thus they should applied only in specialized centers of pancreatology. This review depicts the state of the art of the two techniques.

2 Review Screening/surveillance programs for pancreatic cancer in familial high-risk individuals: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis of screening results. 2018

Paiella, Salvatore / Salvia, Roberto / De Pastena, Matteo / Pollini, Tommaso / Casetti, Luca / Landoni, Luca / Esposito, Alessandro / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Malleo, Giuseppe / De Marchi, Giulia / Scarpa, Aldo / D'Onofrio, Mirko / De Robertis, Riccardo / Pan, Teresa Lucia / Maggino, Laura / Andrianello, Stefano / Secchettin, Erica / Bonamini, Deborah / Melisi, Davide / Tuveri, Massimiliano / Bassi, Claudio. ·General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: salvatore.paiella@univr.it. · General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. · Gastroenterology B Unit, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. · Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; ARC-NET Research Center, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. · Department of Radiology, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. · Department of Radiology, Casa di Cura Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy. · Oncology Unit, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. ·Pancreatology · Pubmed #29709409.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Screening/surveillance programs for pancreatic cancer (PC) in familial high-risk individuals (FPC-HRI) have been widely reported, but their merits remain unclear. The data reported so far are heterogeneous-especially in terms of screening yield. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available data coming from screening/surveillance programs to evaluate the proportion of screening goal achievement (SGA), overall surgery and unnecessary surgery. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library database from January 2000 to December 2016to identify studies reporting results of screening/surveillance programs including cohorts of FPC-HRI. The main outcome measures were weighted proportion of SGA, overall surgery, and unnecessary surgery among the FPC-HRI cohort, using a random effects model. SGA was defined as any diagnosis of resectable PC, PanIN3, or high-grade dysplasia intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (HGD-IPMN). Unnecessary surgery was defined as any other final pathology. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis of 16 studies reporting on 1551 FPC-HRI cases, 30 subjects (1.82%), received a diagnosis of PC, PanIN3 or HGD-IPMNs. The pooled proportion of SGA was 1.4%(95% CI 0.8-2, p < 0.001, I CONCLUSIONS: The weighted proportion of SGA of screening/surveillance programs published thus far is excellent. However, the probability of receiving surgery during the screening/surveillance program is non-negligible, and unnecessary surgery is a potential negative outcome.