Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Philippos Orfanos
Based on 2 articles published since 2010
(Why 2 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, Philippos Orfanos wrote the following 2 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Article Meat and fish consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. 2013

Rohrmann, Sabine / Linseisen, Jakob / Nöthlings, Ute / Overvad, Kim / Egeberg, Rikke / Tjønneland, Anne / Boutron-Ruault, Marie Christine / Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise / Cottet, Vanessa / Pala, Valeria / Tumino, Rosario / Palli, Domenico / Panico, Salvatore / Vineis, Paolo / Boeing, Heiner / Pischon, Tobias / Grote, Verena / Teucher, Birigit / Khaw, Kay-Tee / Wareham, Nicholas J / Crowe, Francesca L / Goufa, Ioulia / Orfanos, Philippos / Trichopoulou, Antonia / Jeurnink, Suzanne M / Siersema, Peter D / Peeters, Petra H M / Brustad, Magritt / Engeset, Dagrun / Skeie, Guri / Duell, Eric J / Amiano, Pilar / Barricarte, Aurelio / Molina-Montes, Esther / Rodríguez, Laudina / Tormo, María-José / Sund, Malin / Ye, Weimin / Lindkvist, Björn / Johansen, Dorthe / Ferrari, Pietro / Jenab, Mazda / Slimani, Nadia / Ward, Heather / Riboli, Elio / Norat, Teresa / Bueno-de-Mesquita, H Bas. ·Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. sabine.rohrmann@ifspm.uzh.ch ·Int J Cancer · Pubmed #22610753.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide with large geographical variation, which implies the contribution of diet and lifestyle in its etiology. We examined the association of meat and fish consumption with risk of pancreatic cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). A total of 477,202 EPIC participants from 10 European countries recruited between 1992 and 2000 were included in our analysis. Until 2008, 865 nonendocrine pancreatic cancer cases have been observed. Calibrated relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using multivariable-adjusted Cox hazard regression models. The consumption of red meat (RR per 50 g increase per day = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.93-1.14) and processed meat (RR per 50 g increase per day = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.71-1.23) were not associated with an increased pancreatic cancer risk. Poultry consumption tended to be associated with an increased pancreatic cancer risk (RR per 50 g increase per day = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.04-2.84); however, there was no association with fish consumption (RR per 50 g increase per day = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.92-1.62). Our results do not support the conclusion of the World Cancer Research Fund that red or processed meat consumption may possibly increase the risk of pancreatic cancer. The positive association of poultry consumption with pancreatic cancer might be a chance finding as it contradicts most previous findings.

2 Article No association between educational level and pancreatic cancer incidence in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. 2010

van Boeckel, Petra G A / Boshuizen, Hendriek C / Siersema, Peter D / Vrieling, Alina / Kunst, Anton E / Ye, Weimin / Sund, Malin / Michaud, Dominique S / Gallo, Valentina / Spencer, Elizabeth A / Trichopoulou, Antonia / Benetou, Vasiliki / Orfanos, Philippos / Cirera, Lluis / Duell, Eric J / Rohrmann, Sabine / Hemann, Silke / Masala, Giovanni / Manjer, Jonas / Mattiello, Amalia / Lindkvist, Bjorn / Sánchez, María-José / Pala, Valeria / Peeters, Petra H M / Braaten, Tonje / Tjonneland, Anne / Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg / Larranaga, Nerea / Dorronsoro, Miren / Overvad, Kim / Illner, Anne-Kathrin / Ardanaz, Eva / Marron, M / Straif, K / Riboli, E / Bueno-de-Mesquita, B. ·National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. p.g.a.vanboeckel@umcutrecht.nl ·Cancer Epidemiol · Pubmed #20829145.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Until now, studies examining the relationship between socioeconomic status and pancreatic cancer incidence have been inconclusive. AIM: To prospectively investigate to what extent pancreatic cancer incidence varies according to educational level within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. METHODS: In the EPIC study, socioeconomic status at baseline was measured using the highest level of education attained. Hazard ratios by educational level and a summary index, the relative indices of inequality (RII), were estimated using Cox regression models stratified by age, gender, and center and adjusted for known risk factors. In addition, we conducted separate analyses by age, gender and geographical region. RESULTS: Within the source population of 407, 944 individuals at baseline, 490 first incident primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases were identified in 9 European countries. The crude difference in risk of pancreatic cancer according to level of education was small and not statistically significant (RII=1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.62). Adjustment for known risk factors reduced the inequality estimates to only a small extent. In addition, no statistically significant associations were observed for age groups (adjusted RII(≤ 60 years)=0.85, 95% CI 0.44-1.64, adjusted RII(>60 years)=1.18, 95% CI 0.73-1.90), gender (adjusted RII(male)=1.20, 95% CI 0.68-2.10, adjusted RII(female)=0.96, 95% CI 0.56-1.62) or geographical region (adjusted RII(Northern Europe)=1.14, 95% CI 0.81-1.61, adjusted RII(Middle Europe)=1.72, 95% CI 0.93-3.19, adjusted RII(Southern Europe)=0.75, 95% CI 0.32-1.80). CONCLUSION: Despite large educational inequalities in many risk factors within the EPIC study, we found no evidence for an association between educational level and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer in this European cohort.