Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Christophe Mariette
Based on 9 articles published since 2010
(Why 9 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, C. Mariette wrote the following 9 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Clinical Trial External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. 2011

Pessaux, Patrick / Sauvanet, Alain / Mariette, Christophe / Paye, François / Muscari, Fabrice / Cunha, Antonio Sa / Sastre, Bernard / Arnaud, Jean-Pierre / Anonymous910688. ·Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Université de Strasbourg, France. patrick.pessaux@chru-strasbourg.fr ·Ann Surg · Pubmed #21368658.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81). The criteria of inclusion were soft pancreas and a diameter of wirsung <3 mm. The primary study end point was PF rate defined as amylase-rich fluid (amylase concentration >3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level) collected from the peripancreatic drains after postoperative day 3. CT scan was routinely done on day 7. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable concerning demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting symptoms, presence of comorbid illness, and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage. Mortality, morbidity, and PF rates were 3.8%, 51.8%, and 34.2%, respectively. Stented group had a significantly lower overall PF (26% vs. 42%; P = 0.034), morbidity (41.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (7.8% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.001) rates compared with nonstented group. Radiologic or surgical intervention for PF was required in 9 patients in the stented group and 12 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (3.7% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.37) and in hospital stay (22 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced. PF and overall morbidity rates after PD in high risk patients (soft pancreatic texture and a nondilated pancreatic duct).

2 Clinical Trial [Locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone: Definitive results of the 2000-2001 FFCD/SFRO phase III trial]. 2011

Barhoumi, M / Mornex, F / Bonnetain, F / Rougier, P / Mariette, C / Bouché, O / Bosset, J-F / Aparicio, T / Mineur, L / Azzedine, A / Hammel, P / Butel, J / Stremsdoerfer, N / Maingon, P / Bedenne, L / Chauffert, B. ·EA, département de radiothérapie-oncologie, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France. barhoumi.maha@yahoo.fr ·Cancer Radiother · Pubmed #21315644.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To compare chemoradiation with systemic chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with World Health Organization performance status of zero to two were randomly assigned to either the induction chemoradiation group (60 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction; concomitant 5-fluoro-uracil infusion, 300 mg/m(2) per day, days 1-5 for 6 weeks; cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2) per day, days 1-5 during weeks 1 and 5) or the induction gemcitabine group (GEM: 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks). Maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) weekly, 3/4 weeks) was given in both arms until disease progression or toxicity. RESULTS: Overall survival was shorter in the chemoradiation than in the gemcitabine arm (median survival 8.6 [99% confidence interval 7.1-11.4] and 13 months [8,9,9-18], p=0.03). One-year survival was, respectively, 32 and 53%. These results were confirmed in a per-protocol analysis for patients who received 75% or more of the planned dose of radiotherapy. More overall grades 3-4 toxic effects were recorded in the chemoradiation arm, both during induction (36 versus 22%) and maintenance (32 versus 18%). CONCLUSION: This intensive induction schedule of chemoradiation was more toxic and less effective than gemcitabine alone.

3 Clinical Trial Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. 2010

Neoptolemos, John P / Stocken, Deborah D / Bassi, Claudio / Ghaneh, Paula / Cunningham, David / Goldstein, David / Padbury, Robert / Moore, Malcolm J / Gallinger, Steven / Mariette, Christophe / Wente, Moritz N / Izbicki, Jakob R / Friess, Helmut / Lerch, Markus M / Dervenis, Christos / Oláh, Attila / Butturini, Giovanni / Doi, Ryuichiro / Lind, Pehr A / Smith, David / Valle, Juan W / Palmer, Daniel H / Buckels, John A / Thompson, Joyce / McKay, Colin J / Rawcliffe, Charlotte L / Büchler, Markus W / Anonymous10060671. ·Liverpool Cancer Research UK Cancer Trials Unit, Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Liverpool, Fifth Floor, UCD Bldg, Daulby Street, Liverpool, L69 3GA, United Kingdom. j.p.neoptolemos@liverpool.ac.uk ·JAMA · Pubmed #20823433.

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: Adjuvant fluorouracil has been shown to be of benefit for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine is known to be the most effective agent in advanced disease as well as an effective agent in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fluorouracil or gemcitabine is superior in terms of overall survival as adjuvant treatment following resection of pancreatic cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-3 trial, an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial conducted in 159 pancreatic cancer centers in Europe, Australasia, Japan, and Canada. Included in ESPAC-3 version 2 were 1088 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone cancer resection; patients were randomized between July 2000 and January 2007 and underwent at least 2 years of follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either fluorouracil plus folinic acid (folinic acid, 20 mg/m(2), intravenous bolus injection, followed by fluorouracil, 425 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus injection given 1-5 days every 28 days) (n = 551) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion once a week for 3 of every 4 weeks) (n = 537) for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was overall survival; secondary measures were toxicity, progression-free survival, and quality of life. RESULTS: Final analysis was carried out on an intention-to-treat basis after a median of 34.2 (interquartile range, 27.1-43.4) months' follow-up after 753 deaths (69%). Median survival was 23.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-25.0) months for patients treated with fluorouracil plus folinic acid and 23.6 (95% CI, 21.4-26.4) months for those treated with gemcitabine (chi(1)(2) = 0.7; P = .39; hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.81-1.08]). Seventy-seven patients (14%) receiving fluorouracil plus folinic acid had 97 treatment-related serious adverse events, compared with 40 patients (7.5%) receiving gemcitabine, who had 52 events (P < .001). There were no significant differences in either progression-free survival or global quality-of-life scores between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with the use of fluorouracil plus folinic acid, gemcitabine did not result in improved overall survival in patients with completely resected pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00058201.

4 Article Safety of Islet Autotransplantation After Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma. 2019

Renaud, Florence / Chetboun, Mikael / Thevenet, Julien / Delalleau, Nathalie / Gmyr, Valery / Hubert, Thomas / Bonner, Caroline / Messager, Mathieu / Leteurtre, Emmanuelle / Mariette, Christophe / Kerr-Conte, Julie / Piessen, Guillaume / Pattou, François. ·CHU Lille, Institute of Pathology, Centre de Biologie Pathologie Lille, France. · Centre de Recherche Jean-Pierre AUBERT Neurosciences et Cancer, Univ Lille, Lille, France. · SIRIC OncoLille, Lille, France. · Department of Endocrine Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France. · Translational Research for Diabetes, Inserm, Lille, France. · European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, Univ Lille, Lille, France. · Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France. ·Transplantation · Pubmed #30113997.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Total pancreatectomy with intraportal islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) rather than partial pancreatectomy could represent a major shift in the management of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) when risks of postoperative pancreatic fistula are well identified. This approach provides a theoretical risk of tumor cell dissemination when islet cells are transplanted into the portal vein. Our objective was to explore the safety of TPIAT in PDAC in a mouse preclinical model of subcutaneous xenotransplantation of human cells isolated from pancreatic specimen during partial pancreatectomy performed for PDAC. METHODS: Patients requiring pancreatectomy for PDAC were prospectively included. Immunocompromised mice were transplanted with pancreatic cells isolated from the nonmalignant part of the surgical specimen (experimental group). Results were compared with pancreatic tumor implants (control group). Pancreatic grafts were explanted at 6 weeks for histological analyses. RESULTS: Nine patients were included, and 31 mice were transplanted. In the experimental group, explants were microscopically devoid of tumor cell, and no metastasis was observed. In the control group, all explants were composed of tumor. CONCLUSIONS: We report in a preclinical model the absence of local and distant spreading of malignant cells after pancreatic islets xenograft isolated from PDAC patients. These data supports the oncological safety of TPIAT as valuable alternative to partial pancreatectomy for PDAC patients with a high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

5 Article Fukuoka-Negative Branch-Duct IPMNs: When to Worry? A Study from the French Surgical Association (AFC). 2018

Duconseil, Pauline / Adham, Mustapha / Sauvanet, Alain / Autret, Aurélie / Périnel, Julie / Chiche, Laurence / Mabrut, Jean-Yves / Tuech, Jean-Jacques / Mariette, Christophe / Turrini, Olivier. ·Department of Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France. pauline.duconseil@gmail.com. · Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France. pauline.duconseil@gmail.com. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Paris, France. · Department of Biostatistics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. · Department of Surgery, Maison du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Claude-Huriez, Lille, France. · Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. ·Ann Surg Oncol · Pubmed #29392508.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the pathologic findings for patients with Fukuoka-negative branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) who theoretically were eligible for surveillance care with follow-up assessment, but instead underwent resection. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2012, 820 patients underwent evaluation for IPMN. At initial staging, 319 patients had BD-IPMN, and 89 of these patients presented with Fukuoka-negative criteria. These 89 patients were included in this study. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients, 55 (62%) underwent pancreatectomy. After pathologic examination, the ultimate diagnosis was MT-IPMN for 20 (36%) of these patients (the MT group) and BD-IPMN for 35 (64%) of these patients (the BD group). The remaining 34 patients (38%) underwent enucleation. The patients in the MT group were more likely to be male (P = 0.01) and to have a higher rate of recent (< 1 year) diabetes mellitus diagnosis (P = 0.007) than the patients in the BD group. In the multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus was independently associated with involvement of the main pancreatic duct (P = 0.05). Malignancy was diagnosed for 14 (16%) of the 89 patients. The rate of invasive IPMN was higher in the MT group than in the BD group (20% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). The 5-year overall survival rate was 100% for the BD group and 84% for the MT group (P = 0.02). For the male patients with diabetes mellitus, the rate of malignancy rose to 67%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a diagnosis of Fukuoka-negative BD-IPMN, resection should be considered primarily for male patients with a recent diabetes mellitus diagnosis.

6 Article Resectable invasive IPMN versus sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: Should these two different diseases receive the same treatment? A matched comparison study of the French Surgical Association (AFC). 2017

Duconseil, P / Périnel, J / Autret, A / Adham, M / Sauvanet, A / Chiche, L / Mabrut, J-Y / Tuech, J-J / Mariette, C / Régenet, N / Fabre, J-M / Bachellier, P / Delpéro, J-R / Paye, F / Turrini, O. ·Department of Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France. Electronic address: pauline.duconseil@gmail.com. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, HCL, UCBL1, Lyon, France. · Department of Biostatistics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Paris, France. · Department of Surgery, Maison du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Claude-Huriez, Lille, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France. · Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. · Department of Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France. ·Eur J Surg Oncol · Pubmed #28687431.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To compare survival and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IIPMN) and sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 240 patients underwent pancreatectomy for IIPMN and 1327 for PDAC. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic resection other than PD, vascular resection, carcinoma in situ, or <11 examined lymph nodes. Thus, 82 IIPMN and 506 PDAC were eligible for the present study. Finally, The IIPMN group was matched 1:2 to compose the PDAC group according to TNM disease stage, perineural invasion, lymph node ratio, and margin status. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient's characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and histologic parameters. Overall survival and disease-free survival times were comparable between the 2 groups. In each group, overall survival time was significantly poorer in patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.03 for the IIPMN group; p = 0.03 for the PDAC group). In lymph-node negative patients of the IIPMN group, adjuvant chemotherapy did not have any significant impact on overall survival time (OR = 0.57; 95% CI [0.24-1.33]). Considering the whole population (i.e. patients with IIPMN and PDAC; n = 246), patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy had poorer survival (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The courses of IIPMN and PDAC were similar after an optimized stage-to-stage comparison. Adjuvant chemotherapy was efficient in both groups. However, in lymph node negative patients, adjuvant chemotherapy seemed not to have a significant impact.

7 Article Early Enteral Versus Total Parenteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial (Nutri-DPC). 2016

Perinel, Julie / Mariette, Christophe / Dousset, Bertrand / Sielezneff, Igor / Gainant, Alain / Mabrut, Jean-Yves / Bin-Dorel, Sylvie / Bechwaty, Michel El / Delaunay, Dominique / Bernard, Lorraine / Sauvanet, Alain / Pocard, Marc / Buc, Emmanuel / Adham, Mustapha. ·*Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, HCL, UCBL1, Lyon, France†Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Hôpital C. Huriez CHRU, Lille, France‡Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Cochin - St-Vincent de Paul, Paris, France§Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Timone, Marseille, France¶Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France||Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France**Pole Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, HCL, Lyon, France††Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France‡‡Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Lariboisières, Paris, France§§Department of Digestive Pathology, Surgery Unit, CHU Clermont Ferrand Hôtel Dieu NHE, Clermont Ferrand, France. ·Ann Surg · Pubmed #27429039.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare nasojejunal early enteral nutrition (NJEEN) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN), after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), in terms of postoperative complications. BACKGROUND: Current nutritional guidelines recommend the use of enteral over parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. However, the NJEEN remains controversial in patients undergoing PD. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was conducted between 2011 and 2014. Nine centers in France analyzed 204 patients undergoing PD to NJEEN (n = 103) or TPN (n = 101). Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Successful NJEEN was defined as insertion of a nasojejunal feeding tube, delivering at least 50% of nutritional needs on PoD 5, and no TPN for more than consecutive 48 hours. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 77.5% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 68.1-85.1] patients in the NJEEN group versus 64.4% (95% CI 54.2-73.6) in TPN group (P = 0.040). NJEEN was associated with higher frequency of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (48.1% vs 27.7%, P = 0.012) and higher severity (grade B/C 29.4% vs 13.9%; P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, infectious complications, the grade of postoperative complications, and the length of postoperative stay. A successful NJEEN was achieved in 63% patients. In TPN group, average energy intake was significantly higher (P < 0.001) and patients had an earlier recovery of oral feeding (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PD, NJEEN was associated with an increased overall postoperative complications rate. The frequency and the severity of POPF were also significantly increased after NJEEN. In terms of safety and feasibility, NJEEN should not be recommended.

8 Article miR-219-1-3p is a negative regulator of the mucin MUC4 expression and is a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer. 2015

Lahdaoui, F / Delpu, Y / Vincent, A / Renaud, F / Messager, M / Duchêne, B / Leteurtre, E / Mariette, C / Torrisani, J / Jonckheere, N / Van Seuningen, I. ·1] Inserm, UMR837, Jean Pierre Aubert Research Center (JPARC), Team 5 'Mucins, epithelial differentiation and carcinogenesis', rue Polonovski, Lille Cedex, France [2] Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France [3] Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France. · 1] Inserm, UMR 1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France [2] Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. ·Oncogene · Pubmed #24608432.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers in the world with one of the worst outcome. The oncogenic mucin MUC4 has been identified as an actor of pancreatic carcinogenesis as it is involved in many processes regulating pancreatic cancer cell biology. MUC4 is not expressed in healthy pancreas whereas it is expressed very early in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Targeting MUC4 in these early steps may thus appear as a promising strategy to slow-down pancreatic tumorigenesis. miRNA negative regulation of MUC4 could be one mechanism to efficiently downregulate MUC4 gene expression in early pancreatic neoplastic lesions. Using in silico studies, we found two putative binding sites for miR-219-1-3p in the 3'-UTR of MUC4 and showed that miR-219-1-3p expression is downregulated both in PDAC-derived cell lines and human PDAC tissues compared with their normal counterparts. We then showed that miR-219-1-3p negatively regulates MUC4 mucin expression via its direct binding to MUC4 3'-UTR. MiR-219-1-3p overexpression (transient and stable) in pancreatic cancer cell lines induced a decrease of cell proliferation associated with a decrease of cyclin D1 and a decrease of Akt and Erk pathway activation. MiR-219-1-3p overexpression also decreased cell migration. Furthermore, miR-219-1-3p expression was found to be conversely correlated with Muc4 expression in early pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions of Pdx1-Cre;LSL-Kras(G12D) mice. Most interestingly, in vivo studies showed that miR-219-1-3p injection in xenografted pancreatic tumors in mice decreased both tumor growth and MUC4 mucin expression. Altogether, these results identify miR-219-1-3p as a new negative regulator of MUC4 oncomucin that possesses tumor-suppressor activity in PDAC.

9 Article Isolated granulocytic sarcoma of the pancreas: a tricky diagnostic for primary pancreatic extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia. 2012

Messager, Mathieu / Amielh, David / Chevallier, Caroline / Mariette, Christophe. ·Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Centre Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Place de Verdun, 59037 Lille cedex, France. ·World J Surg Oncol · Pubmed #22248364.

ABSTRACT: We report two clinical cases of primary granulocytic sarcoma of the pancreas that were diagnosed on the surgical specimen. Atypical clinical and morphological presentations may have lead to pretherapeutic biopsies of the pancreatic mass in order to indicate primary chemotherapy. Literature review of this rare clinical presentation may help physicians to anticipate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.