Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Anna Malpaga
Based on 8 articles published since 2010
(Why 8 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, Anna Malpaga wrote the following 8 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Article The Evolution of Surgical Strategies for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (Pan-NENs): Time-trend and Outcome Analysis From 587 Consecutive Resections at a High-volume Institution. 2019

Landoni, Luca / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Pollini, Tommaso / Cingarlini, Sara / D'Onofrio, Mirko / Capelli, Paola / De Robertis, Riccardo / Davì, Maria V / Amodio, Antonio / Impellizzeri, Harmony / Malpaga, Anna / Miotto, Marco / Boninsegna, Letizia / Crepaz, Lorenzo / Nessi, Chiara / Zingaretti, Caterina C / Paiella, Salvatore / Esposito, Alessandro / Casetti, Luca / Malleo, Giuseppe / Tuveri, Massimiliano / Butturini, Giovanni / Salvia, Roberto / Scarpa, Aldo / Falconi, Massimo / Bassi, Claudio. ·General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. · Department of Oncology, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. · Department of Radiology, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. · Department of Pathology, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. · Department of Radiology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. · Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. · Division of Surgery, Ospedale "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria", Negrar (VR), Italy. · Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. · Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" University, Milan, Italy. ·Ann Surg · Pubmed #29189384.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present analysis is 2-fold: first, to define the evolution of time trends on the surgical approach to pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs); second, to perform a complete analysis of the predictors of oncologic outcome. BACKGROUND: Reflecting their rarity and heterogeneity, Pan-NENs represent a clinical dilemma. In particular, there is a scarcity of data regarding their long-term follow-up after surgical resection. METHODS: From the Institutional Pan-NEN database, 587 resected cases from 1990 to 2015 were extracted. The time span was arbitrarily divided into 3 discrete clusters enabling a balanced comparison between patient groups. Analyses for predictors of recurrence and survival were performed, together with conditional survival analyses. RESULTS: Among the 587 resected Pan-NENs, 75% were nonfunctioning tumors, and 5% were syndrome-associated tumors. The mean age was 54 years (±14 years), and 51% of the patients were female. The median tumor size was 20 mm (range 4 to 140), 62% were G1, 32% were G2, and 4% were G3 tumors. Time trends analysis revealed that the number of resected Pan-NENs constantly increased, while the size (from 25 to 20 mm) and G1 proportion (from 65% to 49%) decreased during the study period. After a mean follow-up of 75 months, recurrence analysis revealed that nonfunctioning tumors, tumor grade, N1 status, and vascular invasion were all independent predictors of recurrence. Regardless of size, G1 nonfunctioning tumors with no nodal involvement and vascular invasion had a negligible risk of recurrence at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pan-NENs have been increasingly diagnosed and resected during the last 3 decades, revealing reliable predictors of outcome. Functioning and nodal status, tumor grade, and vascular invasion accurately predict survival and recurrence with resulting implications for patient follow-up.

2 Article Are Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors an Indolent Entity Results from a Single-Center Surgical Series. 2018

Paiella, Salvatore / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Miotto, Marco / Malpaga, Anna / Impellizzeri, Harmony / Montagnini, Greta / Pollini, Tommaso / Nessi, Chiara / Butturini, Giovanni / Capelli, Paola / Posenato, Ilaria / Scarpa, Aldo / D'Onofrio, Mirko / De Robertis, Riccardo / Cingarlini, Sara / Boninsegna, Letizia / Bassi, Claudio / Salvia, Roberto / Landoni, Luca. · ·Neuroendocrinology · Pubmed #28586782.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (CPanNETs) represent an uncommon variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Due to their rarity, there is a lack of knowledge with regard to clinical features and postoperative outcome. METHODS: The prospectively maintained surgical database of a high-volume institution was queried, and 46 resected CPanNETs were detected from 1988 to 2015. Clinical, demographic, and pathological features and survival outcomes of CPanNETs were described and matched with a population of 92 solid PanNETs (SPanNETs) for comparison. RESULTS: CPanNETs accounted for 7.8% of the overall number of resected PanNETs (46/587). CPanNETs were mostly sporadic (n = 42, 91%) and nonfunctioning (39%). Two functioning CPanNETs were detected (4.3%), and they were 2 gastrinomas. The median tumor diameter was 30 mm (range 10-120). All tumors were well differentiated, with 38 (82.6%) G1 and 8 (17.4%) G2 tumors. Overall, no CPanNET showed a Ki-67 >5%. A correct preoperative diagnosis of a CPanNET was made in half of the cases. After a median follow-up of >70 months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival of resected CPanNETs was 93.8 and 62.5%, respectively, compared to 92.7 and 84.6% for SPanNETs (p > 0.05). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 94.5 and 88.2% for CPanNETs and 81.8 and 78.9% for SPanNETs, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the setting of a surgical cohort, CPanNETs are rare, nonfunctional, and well-differentiated neoplasms. After surgical resection, they share the excellent outcome of their well-differentiated solid counterparts for both survival and recurrence.

3 Article Comparison of imaging-based and pathological dimensions in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. 2017

Paiella, Salvatore / Impellizzeri, Harmony / Zanolin, Elisabetta / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Miotto, Marco / Malpaga, Anna / De Robertis, Riccardo / D'Onofrio, Mirko / Rusev, Borislav / Capelli, Paola / Cingarlini, Sara / Butturini, Giovanni / Davì, Maria Vittoria / Amodio, Antonio / Bassi, Claudio / Scarpa, Aldo / Salvia, Roberto / Landoni, Luca. ·Salvatore Paiella, Harmony Impellizzeri, Giovanni Marchegiani, Marco Miotto, Anna Malpaga, Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia, Luca Landoni, General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy. ·World J Gastroenterol · Pubmed #28533666.

ABSTRACT: AIM: To establish the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) and computer tomography (CT) to predict pathologic dimensions of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) in a caseload of a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients submitted to surgery for PanNET at the Surgical Unit of the Pancreas Institute with at least 1 preoperative imaging examination (MR or CT scan) from January 2005 to December 2015 were included and data retrospectively collected. Exclusion criteria were: multifocal lesions, genetic syndromes, microadenomas or mixed tumors, metastatic disease and neoadjuvant therapy. Bland-Altman (BA) and Mountain-Plot (MP) statistics were used to compare size measured by each modality with the pathology size. Passing-Bablok (PB) regression analysis was used to check the agreement between MR and CT. RESULTS: Our study population consisted of 292 patients. Seventy-nine (27.1%) were functioning PanNET. The mean biases were 0.17 ± 7.99 mm, 1 ± 8.51 mm and 0.23 ± 9 mm, 1.2 ± 9.8 mm for MR and CT, considering the overall population and the subgroup of non-functioning- PanNET, respectively. Limits of agreement (LOA) included the vast majority of observations, indicating a good agreement between imaging and pathology. The MP further confirmed this finding and showed that the two methods are unbiased with respect to each other. Considering ≤ 2 cm non-functioning-PanNET, no statistical significance was found in the size estimation rate of MR and CT ( CONCLUSION: MR and CT scan are accurate and interchangeable imaging techniques in predicting pathologic dimensions of PanNET.

4 Article Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. 2017

Scarpa, Aldo / Chang, David K / Nones, Katia / Corbo, Vincenzo / Patch, Ann-Marie / Bailey, Peter / Lawlor, Rita T / Johns, Amber L / Miller, David K / Mafficini, Andrea / Rusev, Borislav / Scardoni, Maria / Antonello, Davide / Barbi, Stefano / Sikora, Katarzyna O / Cingarlini, Sara / Vicentini, Caterina / McKay, Skye / Quinn, Michael C J / Bruxner, Timothy J C / Christ, Angelika N / Harliwong, Ivon / Idrisoglu, Senel / McLean, Suzanne / Nourse, Craig / Nourbakhsh, Ehsan / Wilson, Peter J / Anderson, Matthew J / Fink, J Lynn / Newell, Felicity / Waddell, Nick / Holmes, Oliver / Kazakoff, Stephen H / Leonard, Conrad / Wood, Scott / Xu, Qinying / Nagaraj, Shivashankar Hiriyur / Amato, Eliana / Dalai, Irene / Bersani, Samantha / Cataldo, Ivana / Dei Tos, Angelo P / Capelli, Paola / Davì, Maria Vittoria / Landoni, Luca / Malpaga, Anna / Miotto, Marco / Whitehall, Vicki L J / Leggett, Barbara A / Harris, Janelle L / Harris, Jonathan / Jones, Marc D / Humphris, Jeremy / Chantrill, Lorraine A / Chin, Venessa / Nagrial, Adnan M / Pajic, Marina / Scarlett, Christopher J / Pinho, Andreia / Rooman, Ilse / Toon, Christopher / Wu, Jianmin / Pinese, Mark / Cowley, Mark / Barbour, Andrew / Mawson, Amanda / Humphrey, Emily S / Colvin, Emily K / Chou, Angela / Lovell, Jessica A / Jamieson, Nigel B / Duthie, Fraser / Gingras, Marie-Claude / Fisher, William E / Dagg, Rebecca A / Lau, Loretta M S / Lee, Michael / Pickett, Hilda A / Reddel, Roger R / Samra, Jaswinder S / Kench, James G / Merrett, Neil D / Epari, Krishna / Nguyen, Nam Q / Zeps, Nikolajs / Falconi, Massimo / Simbolo, Michele / Butturini, Giovanni / Van Buren, George / Partelli, Stefano / Fassan, Matteo / Anonymous6880896 / Khanna, Kum Kum / Gill, Anthony J / Wheeler, David A / Gibbs, Richard A / Musgrove, Elizabeth A / Bassi, Claudio / Tortora, Giampaolo / Pederzoli, Paolo / Pearson, John V / Waddell, Nicola / Biankin, Andrew V / Grimmond, Sean M. ·ARC-Net Centre for Applied Research on Cancer, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy. · Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy. · Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK. · West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK. · The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, University of New South Wales, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. · Department of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, Sydney, New South Wales 2200, Australia. · South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia. · QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston Road, Brisbane 4006, Australia. · Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. · Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy. · Medical Oncology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. · Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Treviso, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Italy. · Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. · The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane 4006, Australia. · Pathology Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia. · Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brisbane 4006, Australia. · Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. · School of Environmental &Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales 2258, Australia. · Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Centre for Cancer Bioinformatics, Peking University Cancer Hospital &Institute, Beijing 100142, China. · Department of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Woollongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia. · Department of Anatomical Pathology. St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. · Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 OSF, UK. · Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Greater Glasgow &Clyde NHS, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK. · Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS226, Houston, Texas 77030-3411, USA. · Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery and The Elkins Pancreas Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030-3411, USA. · Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. · Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. · Department of Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, New South Wales 2065, Australia. · University of Sydney. Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. · Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia. · School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales 2175, Australia. · Department of Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, Western Australia 6160, Australia. · Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. · School of Surgery M507, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia. · St John of God Pathology, 12 Salvado Rd, Subiaco, Western Australia 6008, Australia. · Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia 6008, Australia. · University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia. ·Nature · Pubmed #28199314.

ABSTRACT: The diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) is increasing owing to more sensitive detection methods, and this increase is creating challenges for clinical management. We performed whole-genome sequencing of 102 primary PanNETs and defined the genomic events that characterize their pathogenesis. Here we describe the mutational signatures they harbour, including a deficiency in G:C > T:A base excision repair due to inactivation of MUTYH, which encodes a DNA glycosylase. Clinically sporadic PanNETs contain a larger-than-expected proportion of germline mutations, including previously unreported mutations in the DNA repair genes MUTYH, CHEK2 and BRCA2. Together with mutations in MEN1 and VHL, these mutations occur in 17% of patients. Somatic mutations, including point mutations and gene fusions, were commonly found in genes involved in four main pathways: chromatin remodelling, DNA damage repair, activation of mTOR signalling (including previously undescribed EWSR1 gene fusions), and telomere maintenance. In addition, our gene expression analyses identified a subgroup of tumours associated with hypoxia and HIF signalling.

5 Article Role of Combined 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnostic Workup of Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Managing Surgical Decisions. 2017

Cingarlini, Sara / Ortolani, Silvia / Salgarello, Matteo / Butturini, Giovanni / Malpaga, Anna / Malfatti, Veronica / DʼOnofrio, Mirko / Davì, Maria Vittoria / Vallerio, Paola / Ruzzenente, Andrea / Capelli, Paola / Citton, Elia / Grego, Elisabetta / Trentin, Chiara / De Robertis, Riccardo / Scarpa, Aldo / Bassi, Claudio / Tortora, Giampaolo. ·From the *Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, G.B. Rossi University Hospital of Verona; †Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar; ‡Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera; Departments of §Pancreatic Surgery, ∥Radiology, ¶Internal Medicine, #Hepatobiliary Surgery, and **Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, G.B. Rossi University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy. ·Pancreas · Pubmed #27906872.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Ga-DOTATOC (Ga) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is recommended in the workup of pancreas neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs); evidence suggests that F-FDG (F) PET/CT can also provide prognostic information. Aims of this study were to assess the role of combined Ga- and F-PET/CT in the evaluation of grade (G) 1-2 PanNETs and to test the correlation between F-PET/CT positivity and tumor grade. METHODS: Preoperative Ga- and F-PET/CT of 35 patients with surgically resected G1-2 PanNETs were evaluated. For grading, the 2010 World Health Organization Classification was used; an ancillary analysis with Ki67 cutoffs at 5% to 20% was conducted. Correlation between F-PET/CT positivity (SUVmax > 3.5) and grade was assessed. RESULTS: Of 35 PanNETs, 28.6% and 71.4% were G1 and G2 as per World Health Organization. Ga-PET/CT showed high sensitivity (94.3%) in detecting G1-2 PanNETs. F-PET/CT was positive in 20% and 76% G1 and G2 tumors (P = 0.002). F-PET/CT identified G2 PanNETs with high positive predictive value (PPV, 90.5%). F-PET/CT correlated with tumor grade also in the ancillary analysis (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity of Ga-PET/CT in NET detection is known. The high PPV of F-PET/CT in the identification of G2 forms suggests its potential role in PanNETs prognostication and risk stratification.

6 Article Distal pancreatectomy associated with multivisceral resection: results from a single centre experience. 2017

Panzeri, Francesca / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Malleo, Giuseppe / Malpaga, Anna / Maggino, Laura / Marchese, Tiziana / Salvia, Roberto / Bassi, Claudio / Butturini, Giovanni. ·Department of General Surgery, Ospedale "Mater Salutis", Legnago, VR, Italy. · Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, VR, Italy. · Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, VR, Italy. claudio.bassi@univr.it. · Pancreatic Surgery Department, Casa di Cura "Dott. Pederzoli", Peschiera del Garda, VR, Italy. ·Langenbecks Arch Surg · Pubmed #27787606.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Tumors arising in the body/tail of the pancreas tend to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage, with a lower rate of resectability compared to disease of the head. Distal pancreatectomy (DP) associated to multivisceral resections (MVR) can represent a surgical option for selected patients with advanced tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent DP associated with MVR at our Institution over a 9-year period, and compared them to standard DP. MVR was defined as resection of at least one additional organ or vascular structure because of neoplastic involvement. RESULTS: Out of 508 DP, in 59 cases MVR was performed. The absolute incidence of complications was comparable between the two groups (69.5 % in MVR arm vs. 57.2 % in control arm, p = 0.072) but more patients in the study group had a Clavien-Dindo class ≥3 (18.6 vs. 9.8 %, p = 0.04). A longer operative time (291 ± 91 vs. 227 ± 67, p < 0.001), an increased need for intraoperative transfusions (21.4 vs. 3.3 %, p < 0.001) and a slightly longer hospitalization (9 [7-16] days vs. 8 [7-10]; p < 0.001) were observed in the MVR group. In patients with ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 118), mortality was comparable between groups (p = 0.44) over a median follow up of 26 [16-41] months. In contrast, among patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms, mortality was higher in the study group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Multivisceral resection for cancer of body and tail of the pancreas is feasible in selected cases, with an acceptable surgical complication rate compared to standard procedures and a favorable long-term survival in ductal cancer.

7 Article Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveal epigenetic deregulation of SLIT-ROBO, ITGA2 and MET signaling. 2014

Nones, Katia / Waddell, Nic / Song, Sarah / Patch, Ann-Marie / Miller, David / Johns, Amber / Wu, Jianmin / Kassahn, Karin S / Wood, David / Bailey, Peter / Fink, Lynn / Manning, Suzanne / Christ, Angelika N / Nourse, Craig / Kazakoff, Stephen / Taylor, Darrin / Leonard, Conrad / Chang, David K / Jones, Marc D / Thomas, Michelle / Watson, Clare / Pinese, Mark / Cowley, Mark / Rooman, Ilse / Pajic, Marina / Anonymous890784 / Butturini, Giovanni / Malpaga, Anna / Corbo, Vincenzo / Crippa, Stefano / Falconi, Massimo / Zamboni, Giuseppe / Castelli, Paola / Lawlor, Rita T / Gill, Anthony J / Scarpa, Aldo / Pearson, John V / Biankin, Andrew V / Grimmond, Sean M. ·Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. ·Int J Cancer · Pubmed #24500968.

ABSTRACT: The importance of epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation in tumorigenesis is increasingly being appreciated. To define the genome-wide pattern of DNA methylation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), we captured the methylation profiles of 167 untreated resected PDACs and compared them to a panel of 29 adjacent nontransformed pancreata using high-density arrays. A total of 11,634 CpG sites associated with 3,522 genes were significantly differentially methylated (DM) in PDAC and were capable of segregating PDAC from non-malignant pancreas, regardless of tumor cellularity. As expected, PDAC hypermethylation was most prevalent in the 5' region of genes (including the proximal promoter, 5'UTR and CpG islands). Approximately 33% DM genes showed significant inverse correlation with mRNA expression levels. Pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of aberrantly methylated genes involved in key molecular mechanisms important to PDAC: TGF-β, WNT, integrin signaling, cell adhesion, stellate cell activation and axon guidance. Given the recent discovery that SLIT-ROBO mutations play a clinically important role in PDAC, the role of epigenetic perturbation of axon guidance was pursued in more detail. Bisulfite amplicon deep sequencing and qRT-PCR expression analyses confirmed recurrent perturbation of axon guidance pathway genes SLIT2, SLIT3, ROBO1, ROBO3, ITGA2 and MET and suggests epigenetic suppression of SLIT-ROBO signaling and up-regulation of MET and ITGA2 expression. Hypomethylation of MET and ITGA2 correlated with high gene expression, which was associated with poor survival. These data suggest that aberrant methylation plays an important role in pancreatic carcinogenesis affecting core signaling pathways with potential implications for the disease pathophysiology and therapy.

8 Article Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. 2013

Malleo, Giuseppe / Mazzarella, Francesca / Malpaga, Anna / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Salvia, Roberto / Bassi, Claudio / Butturini, Giovanni. ·Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery B, Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. ·Surgery · Pubmed #23276391.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranges from 20 to 80%. In patients undergoing resection, it is unclear whether DM impacts on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-PF). METHODS: To address this issue, data from 602 consecutive partial pancreatic resections were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: There were 120 patients with DM; 84 had longstanding DM and 36 a new-onset DM. The incidence of CR-PF was greater among nondiabetics (11.8% vs 5.0%; P = .043), who were also more likely to have a soft pancreatic texture (79.5% vs 46.0%; P = .001) or combined presence of soft texture and small pancreatic duct (high-risk pancreas; P = .001). All these variables did not differ when stratifying by DM type. Univariate analysis showed that gender (P = .005), body mass index (P = .05), DM (P = .043), pancreatic texture (P = .001), pancreatic duct size (P = .012), and the combined presence of soft parenchyma and small duct (P = .001) were associated with CR-PF. On multivariate analysis, DM resulted to be a negative predictor of CR-PF (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; P = .047). Additional variables associated with an increased probability of CR-PF formation were male gender (OR, 3.48; P = .002), soft pancreatic texture (OR, 2.19), pancreatic duct size <3 mm (OR, 1.79), and the combined presence of soft pancreas and small duct (OR, 2.24). CONCLUSION: DM is not a risk factor for CR-PF after resection of PDAC. The decreased incidence of CR-PF in diabetics is likely to be a consequence of a decreased frequency of high-risk features of the pancreatic gland (soft texture and/or small duct).