Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Yuk Ting Ma
Based on 4 articles published since 2010
(Why 4 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, Yuk Ting Ma wrote the following 4 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Clinical Trial Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. 2017

Neoptolemos, John P / Palmer, Daniel H / Ghaneh, Paula / Psarelli, Eftychia E / Valle, Juan W / Halloran, Christopher M / Faluyi, Olusola / O'Reilly, Derek A / Cunningham, David / Wadsley, Jonathan / Darby, Suzanne / Meyer, Tim / Gillmore, Roopinder / Anthoney, Alan / Lind, Pehr / Glimelius, Bengt / Falk, Stephen / Izbicki, Jakob R / Middleton, Gary William / Cummins, Sebastian / Ross, Paul J / Wasan, Harpreet / McDonald, Alec / Crosby, Tom / Ma, Yuk Ting / Patel, Kinnari / Sherriff, David / Soomal, Rubin / Borg, David / Sothi, Sharmila / Hammel, Pascal / Hackert, Thilo / Jackson, Richard / Büchler, Markus W / Anonymous3241111. ·University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: j.p.neoptolemos@liverpool.ac.uk. · University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK. · The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. · University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. · University of Manchester/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. · University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. · The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK. · Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK. · Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. · Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK. · Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. · St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. · Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Research Sörmland, Eskilstuna, Sweden. · University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. · Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK. · University of Hamburg Medical institutions UKE, Hamburg, Germany. · Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK. · Guy's Hospital, London, UK. · Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. · The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK. · Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, UK. · Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. · Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. · Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK. · Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK. · Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. · University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK. · Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France. · University of Heidelberg, Germany. ·Lancet · Pubmed #28129987.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The ESPAC-3 trial showed that adjuvant gemcitabine is the standard of care based on similar survival to and less toxicity than adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Other clinical trials have shown better survival and tumour response with gemcitabine and capecitabine than with gemcitabine alone in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We did a phase 3, two-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised clinical trial at 92 hospitals in England, Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, and Sweden. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had undergone complete macroscopic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (R0 or R1 resection). We randomly assigned patients (1:1) within 12 weeks of surgery to receive six cycles of either 1000 mg/m FINDINGS: Of 732 patients enrolled, 730 were included in the final analysis. Of these, 366 were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine and 364 to gemcitabine plus capecitabine. The Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee requested reporting of the results after there were 458 (95%) of a target of 480 deaths. The median overall survival for patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group was 28·0 months (95% CI 23·5-31·5) compared with 25·5 months (22·7-27·9) in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-0·98], p=0·032). 608 grade 3-4 adverse events were reported by 226 of 359 patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group compared with 481 grade 3-4 adverse events in 196 of 366 patients in the gemcitabine group. INTERPRETATION: The adjuvant combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine should be the new standard of care following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.

2 Article Impact of intensified chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical routine in Europe. 2019

Javed, Muhammad Ahsan / Beyer, Georg / Le, Nha / Vinci, Alessio / Wong, Helen / Palmer, Daniel / Morgan, Robert D / Lamarca, Angela / Hubner, Richard A / Valle, Juan W / Alam, Salma / Chowdhury, Sumsur / Ma, Yuk Ting / Archibugi, Livia / Capurso, Gabriele / Maisonneuve, Patrick / Neesse, Albrecht / Sund, Malin / Schober, Marvin / Krug, Sebastian. ·NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom. · Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; Medical Department II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany. · Gastroenterology Division, Second Internal Medicine Department, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. · University of Pavia, Department of Surgery, S. Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy. · Department of Quality and Information Intelligence, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, United Kingdom. · Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. · Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. · Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. · Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, New Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. · Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy. · Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. · University Medical Centre Göttingen, Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Göttingen, Germany. · University of Umea, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umea, Sweden. Electronic address: malin.sund@surgery.umu.se. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. ·Pancreatology · Pubmed #30529068.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis. Gemcitabine is the standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA). Randomized clinical trials evaluating intensified chemotherapies including FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (NAB+GEM) have shown improvement in survival. Here, we have evaluated the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy in real-life settings across Europe. METHODS: A retrospective multi-center study including 1056 MPA patients, between 2012 and 2015, from nine centers in UK, Germany, Italy, Hungary and the Swedish registry was performed. Follow-up was at least 12 months. Cox proportional Harzards regression was used for uni- and multivariable evaluation of prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 1056 MPA patients, 1030 (98.7%) were assessable for survival analysis. Gemcitabine monotherapy was the most commonly used regimen (41.3%), compared to FOLFIRINOX (n = 204, 19.3%), NAB+GEM (n = 81, 7.7%) and other gemcitabine- or 5-FU-based regimens (n = 335, 31.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was: FOLFIRINOX 9.9 months (95%CI 8.4-12.6), NAB+GEM 7.9 months (95%CI 6.2-10.0), other combinations 8.5 months (95%CI 7.7-9.3) and gemcitabine monotherapy 4.9 months (95%CI 4.4-5.6). Compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, any combination of chemotherapeutics improved the survival with no significant difference between the intensified regimens. Multivariable analysis showed an association between treatment center, male gender, inoperability at diagnosis and performance status (ECOG 1-3) with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine monotherapy was predominantly used in 2012-2015. Intensified chemotherapy improved OS in comparison to gemcitabine monotherapy. In real-life settings, the OS rates of different treatment approaches are lower than shown in randomized phase III trials.

3 Article Use of a genome-wide haploid genetic screen to identify treatment predicting factors: a proof-of-principle study in pancreatic cancer. 2017

Ma, Yuk Ting / Leonard, Sarah M / Gordon, Naheema / Anderton, Jennifer / James, Claire / Huen, David / Woodman, Ciaran B / Palmer, Daniel H. ·School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. · Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom. · Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. ·Oncotarget · Pubmed #28969017.

ABSTRACT: The ability to develop a comprehensive panel of treatment predicting factors would significantly improve our ability to stratify patients for cytotoxic or targeted therapies, and prevent patients receiving ineffective treatments. We have investigated if a recently developed genome-wide haploid genetic screen can be used to reveal the critical mediators of response to anticancer therapy. Pancreatic cancer is known to be highly resistant to systemic therapy. Recently epigenetic changes have been shown to be a key determinant in the maintenance of subpopulations of cancer cells with high-level resistance to cytotoxic therapy. We show that in human pancreatic cancer cell lines, treatment with the potent class I histone deacetylase inhibitor, entinostat, synergistically enhances gemcitabine-induced inhibition of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Using a genome-wide haploid genetic screen, we identified deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) as one of the genes with the highest degree of insertional enrichment following treatment with gemcitabine and entinostat; DCK is already known to be the rate-limiting activating enzyme for gemcitabine. Immunoblotting confirmed loss of DCK protein expression in the resistant KBM7 cells. CRISPR/Cas-9 inactivation of DCK in pancreatic cancer cell lines resulted in resistance to gemcitabine alone and in combination with entinostat. We have identified gemcitabine and entinostat as a potential new combination therapy in pancreatic cancer, and in this proof-of-principle study we have demonstrated that a recently developed haploid genetic screen can be used as a novel approach to identify the critical genes that determine treatment response.

4 Unspecified Gemcitabine-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Series. 2018

Alam, Salma / Illo, Chidi / Ma, Yuk Ting / Punia, Pankaj. ·Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. · School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. ·Case Rep Oncol · Pubmed #29805372.

ABSTRACT: Gemcitabine is not considered a cardiotoxic agent generally; so far only very few case reports have been reported in the literature on different aspects of cardiac side effects. Here we report a case series of 3 patients who developed congestive cardiac failure, when treated with gemcitabine monotherapy in the adjuvant setting for pancreatic cancers. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine has been the standard of care for pancreatic cancer patients after successful surgery since the results of the CONKO-001 and ESPAC3 study were published. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle at 1,000 mg/m