Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Christian Jenssen
Based on 4 articles published since 2009
(Why 4 articles?)
||||

Between 2009 and 2019, Christian Jenssen wrote the following 4 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Guideline Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. 2017

Polkowski, Marcin / Jenssen, Christian / Kaye, Philip / Carrara, Silvia / Deprez, Pierre / Gines, Angels / Fernández-Esparrach, Gloria / Eisendrath, Pierre / Aithal, Guruprasad P / Arcidiacono, Paolo / Barthet, Marc / Bastos, Pedro / Fornelli, Adele / Napoleon, Bertrand / Iglesias-Garcia, Julio / Seicean, Andrada / Larghi, Alberto / Hassan, Cesare / van Hooft, Jeanin E / Dumonceau, Jean-Marc. ·Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Oncology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland. · Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland. · Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Brandenburg, Germany. · Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, UK. · Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy. · Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. · Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. · Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme & Hôpital Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium. · Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. · Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital NORD AP-HM, Aix-Marseille-Université, Marseille, France. · Gastroenterology Department Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal. · Anatomic Pathology Unit, AUSL of Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy. · Department of Gastroenterology, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Private Hospital Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France. · Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. · Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. · Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Gedyt Endoscopy Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ·Endoscopy · Pubmed #28898917.

ABSTRACT: For routine EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and lymph nodes (LNs) ESGE recommends 25G or 22G needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation); fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles are equally recommended (high quality evidence, strong recommendation).When the primary aim of sampling is to obtain a core tissue specimen, ESGE suggests using 19G FNA or FNB needles or 22G FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE recommends using 10-mL syringe suction for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with 25G or 22G FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and other types of needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests neutralizing residual negative pressure in the needle before withdrawing the needle from the target lesion (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend for or against using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and suggests using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling with FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE suggests fanning the needle throughout the lesion when sampling solid masses and LNs (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE equally recommends EUS-guided sampling with or without on-site cytologic evaluation (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). When on-site cytologic evaluation is unavailable, ESGE suggests performance of three to four needle passes with an FNA needle or two to three passes with an FNB needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).For diagnostic sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions without a solid component, ESGE suggests emptying the cyst with a single pass of a 22G or 19G needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). For pancreatic cystic lesions with a solid component, ESGE suggests sampling of the solid component using the same technique as in the case of other solid lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses or LNs (low quality evidence, strong recommendation), and suggests antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones or beta-lactam antibiotics for EUS-guided sampling of cystic lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests that evaluation of tissue obtained by EUS-guided sampling should include histologic preparations (e. g., cell blocks and/or formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue fragments) and should not be limited to smear cytology (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).

2 Review Serous pancreatic neoplasia, data and review. 2017

Dietrich, Christoph F / Dong, Yi / Jenssen, Christian / Ciaravino, Valentina / Hocke, Michael / Wang, Wen-Ping / Burmester, Eike / Moeller, Kathleen / Atkinson, Nathan Ss / Capelli, Paola / D'Onofrio, Mirko. ·Christoph F Dietrich, Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, 97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany. ·World J Gastroenterol · Pubmed #28852316.

ABSTRACT: AIM: To describe the imaging features of serous neoplasms of the pancreas using ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This multicenter international collaboration enhances a literature review to date, reporting features of 287 histologically confirmed cases of serous pancreatic cystic neoplasms (SPNs). RESULTS: Female predominance is seen with most SPNs presenting asymptomatically in the 5 CONCLUSION: The described ultrasound features can aid differentiation of SPN from other neoplastic lesions under most circumstances.

3 Article Endoscopic ultrasound elastography of small solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter study. 2018

Ignee, Andre / Jenssen, Christian / Arcidiacono, Paolo G / Hocke, Michael / Möller, Kathleen / Saftoiu, Adrian / Will, Uwe / Fusaroli, Pietro / Iglesias-Garcia, Julio / Ponnudurai, Ryan / Petrone, Maria C / Braden, Barbara / Burmester, Eike / Dong, Yi / Atkinson, Nathan S / Dietrich, Christoph F. ·Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany. · Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany. · Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. · Department of Internal Medicine 2, Helios Hospital Meiningen GmbH, Meiningen, Germany. · Medical Department I/Gastroenterology, SANA Hospital Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany. · Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania. · SRH Wald Klinikum Gera, Germany. · Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Bologna, Hospital of Imola, Italy. · Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. · Division of Gastroenterology, Prince Court Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. · Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. · Medical Department I, Sana Hospital Lübeck, Germany. · Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. · Ultrasound Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University, China. ·Endoscopy · Pubmed #29689572.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The prevalence of malignancy in patients with small solid pancreatic lesions is low; however, early diagnosis is crucial for successful treatment of these cases. Therefore, a method to reliably distinguish between benign and malignant small solid pancreatic lesions would be highly desirable. We investigated the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography in this setting. METHODS: Patients with solid pancreatic lesions ≤ 15 mm in size and a definite diagnosis were included. Lesion stiffness relative to the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma, as qualitatively assessed and documented at the time of EUS elastography, was retrospectively compared with the final diagnosis obtained by fine-needle aspiration/biopsy or surgical resection. RESULTS: 218 patients were analyzed. The average size of the lesions was 11 ± 3 mm; 23 % were ductal adenocarcinoma, 52 % neuroendocrine tumors, 8 % metastases, and 17 % other entities; 66 % of the lesions were benign. On elastography, 50 % of lesions were stiffer than the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma (stiff lesions) and 50 % were less stiff or of similar stiffness (soft lesions). High stiffness of the lesion had a sensitivity of 84 % (95 % confidence interval 73 % - 91 %), specificity of 67 % (58 % - 74 %), positive predictive value (PPV) of 56 % (50 % - 62 %), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89 % (83 % - 93 %) for the diagnosis of malignancy. For the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 96 % (87 % - 100 %), 64 % (56 % - 71 %), 45 % (40 % - 50 %), and 98 % (93 % - 100 %), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small solid pancreatic lesions, EUS elastography can rule out malignancy with a high level of certainty if the lesion appears soft. A stiff lesion can be either benign or malignant.

4 Article Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions. 2016

Dietrich, Christoph Frank / Sahai, Anand Vasante / D'Onofrio, Mirko / Will, Uwe / Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio / Petrone, Maria Chiara / Hocke, Michael / Braden, Barbara / Burmester, Eike / Möller, Kathleen / Săftoiu, Adrian / Ignee, Andre / Cui, Xin-Wu / Iordache, Sevastita / Potthoff, Andrej / Iglesias-Garcia, Julio / Fusaroli, Pietro / Dong, Yi / Jenssen, Christian. ·Sino-German Research Center of Ultrasound in Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China; Medical Department, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany. · Division of Gastroenterology, CHUM, Hopital Saint Luc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. · Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. · SRH Wald Klinikum Gera, Germany. · PancreatoBiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. · Medical Department, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Meiningen, Germany. · Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom. · Medical Department I, Sana Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. · Medical Department I/Gastroenterology; SANA Hospital Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany. · Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania; Endoscopy Department, Gastrointestinal Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark. · Medical Department, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany. · Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania. · Gastroenterology, Hepatology und Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Foundation for Research in Digestive Diseases, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. · Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna and Hospital of Imola, Imola, Italy. · Medical Department, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany; Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. · Medical Department, Krankenhaus Maerkisch-Oderland, Strausberg, Germany. ·Gastrointest Endosc · Pubmed #27155592.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically diagnosed at a late stage. Little is known about the incidental finding of early-stage PDAC. The aim of the current study was to determine the etiology of small solid pancreatic lesions (≤15 mm) to optimize clinical management. METHODS: Inclusion criterion for the retrospective study analysis was the incidental finding of primarily undetermined small solid pancreatic lesions ≤15 mm in 394 asymptomatic patients. Final diagnoses were based on histology or cytology obtained by imaging-guided biopsy (and at least 12-month follow-up) and/or surgery. Contrast-enhanced US or contrast-enhanced EUS was performed in 219 patients. RESULTS: The final diagnoses of 394 patients were as follows: 146 PDACs, 156 neuroendocrine tumors, 28 metastases into the pancreas from other primary sites, and 64 various other etiologies. Contrast-enhanced US allowed differential diagnosis of PDAC and non-PDAC in 189 of 219 patients (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients with small solid pancreatic lesions had very early stage PDAC. Approximately 60% of small solid pancreatic lesions ≤15 mm are not PDAC and, therefore, do not require radical surgery. Without preoperative diagnosis, an unacceptably large proportion of patients would be exposed to radical surgery with significant morbidity and mortality.