Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Jean-Bernard Dubois
Based on 2 articles published since 2010
(Why 2 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, Jean-Bernard Dubois wrote the following 2 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Article Multi-institutional pooled analysis on adjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer. 2014

Morganti, Alessio G / Falconi, Massimo / van Stiphout, Ruud G P M / Mattiucci, Gian-Carlo / Alfieri, Sergio / Calvo, Felipe A / Dubois, Jean-Bernard / Fastner, Gerd / Herman, Joseph M / Maidment, Bert W / Miller, Robert C / Regine, William F / Reni, Michele / Sharma, Navesh K / Ippolito, Edy / Valentini, Vincenzo. ·Department of Radiotherapy, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy; Unit of Radiotherapy, Unit of General Oncology, Fondazione Giovanni Paolo II, Campobasso, Italy. · Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. · Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW, University Medical Centre Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Department of Radiotherapy, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: gcmattiucci@rm.unicatt.it. · Department of Surgery, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy. · Department of Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain. · Département de Radiothérapie, CRLC, Montpellier Cedex, France. · Department of Radiotherapy, PMU, Salzburg, Austria. · Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. · Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. · Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland. · Department of Oncology, S. Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · Department of Radiation Oncology, University Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy. · Department of Radiotherapy, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy. ·Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys · Pubmed #25220717.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To determine the impact of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) on overall survival (OS) after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multicenter retrospective review of 955 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection with macroscopically negative margins (R0-1) for invasive carcinoma (T1-4; N0-1; M0) of the pancreas was performed. Exclusion criteria included metastatic or unresectable disease at surgery, macroscopic residual disease (R2), treatment with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), and a histological diagnosis of no ductal carcinoma, or postoperative death (within 60 days of surgery). In all, 623 patients received postoperative radiation therapy (RT), 575 patients received concurrent chemotherapy (CT), and 462 patients received adjuvant CT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 21.0 months. Median OS after adjuvant CRT was 39.9 versus 24.8 months after no adjuvant CRT (P<.001) and 27.8 months after CT alone (P<.001). Five-year OS was 41.2% versus 24.8% with and without postoperative CRT, respectively. The positive impact of CRT was confirmed by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72; confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.87; P=.001). Adverse prognostic factors identified by multivariate analysis included the following: R1 resection (HR = 1.17; CI = 1.07-1.28; P<.001), higher pT stage (HR = 1.23; CI = 1.11-1.37; P<.001), positive lymph nodes (HR = 1.27; CI = 1.15-1.41; P<.001), and tumor diameter >20 mm (HR = 1.14; CI = 1.05-1.23; P=.002). Multivariate analysis also showed a better prognosis in patients treated in centers with >10 pancreatic resections per year (HR = 0.87; CI = 0.78-0.97; P=.014) CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest comparative study on adjuvant therapy in patients after resection of carcinoma of the pancreas. Overall survival was better in patients who received adjuvant CRT.

2 Article Bilateral kidney preservation by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) compared to conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies. 2011

Vieillot, Sabine / Azria, David / Riou, Olivier / Moscardo, Carmen Llacer / Dubois, Jean-Bernard / Aillères, Norbert / Fenoglietto, Pascal. ·Département de Cancérologie Radiothérapie et de Radiophysique, CRLC Val d'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France. ·Radiat Oncol · Pubmed #22040762.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: To compare volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans with conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans in pancreatic and bile duct cancers, especially for bilateral kidney preservation. METHODS: A dosimetric analysis was performed in 21 patients who had undergone radiotherapy for pancreatic or bile duct carcinoma at our institution. We compared 4-field 3D-CRT and 2 arcs RapidArc (RA) plans. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) based on the gross disease in a 1.8 Gy daily fraction, 5 days a week. Planning objectives were 95% of the PTV receiving 95% of the prescribed dose and no more than 2% of the PTV receiving more than 107%. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) for the target volume and the organs at risk (right and left kidneys, bowel tract, liver and healthy tissue) were compared. Monitor units and delivery treatment time were also reported. RESULTS: All plans achieved objectives, with 95% of the PTV receiving ≥ 95% of the dose (D95% for 3D-CRT = 48.9 Gy and for RA = 48.6 Gy). RapidArc was shown to be superior to 3D-CRT in terms of organ at risk sparing except for contralateral kidney: for bowel tract, the mean dose was reduced by RA compared to 3D-CRT (16.7 vs 20.8 Gy, p = 0.0001). Similar result was observed for homolateral kidney (mean dose of 4.7 Gy for RA vs 12.6 Gy for 3D-CRT, p < 0.0001), but 3D-CRT significantly reduced controlateral kidney dose with a mean dose of 1.8 Gy vs 3.9 Gy, p < 0.0007. Compared to 3D-CRT, mean MUs for each fraction was significantly increased with RapidArc: 207 vs 589, (p < 0.0001) but the treatment time was not significantly different (2 and 2.66 minutes, p = ns). CONCLUSION: RapidArc allows significant dose reduction, in particular for homolateral kidney and bowel, while maintaining target coverage. This would have a promising impact on reducing toxicities.