Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Dangxiao Cheng
Based on 2 articles published since 2009
(Why 2 articles?)
||||

Between 2009 and 2019, Dangxiao Cheng wrote the following 2 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Article Two BRM promoter polymorphisms predict poor survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. 2018

Pasic, Ivan / Wong, Kit M / Lee, Jonghun J / Espin-Garcia, Osvaldo / Brhane, Yonathan / Cheng, Dangxiao / Chen, Zhuo / Patel, Devalben / Brown, Catherine / Bucur, Roxana / Reisman, David / Knox, Jennifer J / Xu, Wei / Hung, Rayjean J / Liu, Geoffrey / Cleary, Sean P. ·Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. · University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. · Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. · Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. · University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. · Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. ·Mol Carcinog · Pubmed #28892201.

ABSTRACT: Polymorphisms in the promoter of the BRM gene, a critical subunit of the chromatin remodeling SWI/SNF complex, have previously been implicated in risk and prognosis in Caucasian-predominant lung, head and neck, esophageal, and pancreatic cancers, and in hepatocellular cancers in Asians. We investigated the role of these polymorphisms in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk and prognosis. HCC cases were recruited in a comprehensive cancer center while the matched controls were recruited from family practice units from the same catchment area. For risk analyses, unconditional logistic regression analyses were performed in HCC patients and matched healthy controls. Overall survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests. In 266 HCC cases and 536 controls, no association between either BRM promoter polymorphism (BRM-741 or BRM-1321) and risk of HCC was identified (Pā€‰>ā€‰0.10 for all comparisons). There was significant worsening of overall survival as the number of variant alleles increased: BRM-741 per variant allele adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 5.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.89-11.54 and BRM-1321 per variant allele aHR 4.09, 95%CI 2.22-7.51. The effects of these two polymorphisms were at least additive, where individuals who were double homozygotes for the variant alleles had a 45-fold increase in risk of death when compared to those who were double wild-type for the two polymorphisms. Two BRM promoter polymorphisms were strongly associated with HCC prognosis but were not associated with increased HCC susceptibility. The association was strongest in double homozygotes for the allele variants.

2 Article BRM polymorphisms, pancreatic cancer risk and survival. 2016

Segedi, Maja / Anderson, Laura N / Espin-Garcia, Osvaldo / Borgida, Ayelet / Bianco, Teresa / Cheng, Dangxiao / Chen, Zhuo / Patel, Devalben / Brown, M Catherine / Xu, Wei / Reisman, David / Gallinger, Steven / Cotterchio, Michelle / Hung, Rayjean / Liu, Geoffrey / Cleary, Sean P. ·Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network-Ontario Cancer Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. · Mount Sinai Hospital-Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. · Medical Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. · Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada. · Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network-Ontario Cancer Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Geoffrey.Liu@uhn.ca. ·Int J Cancer · Pubmed #27487558.

ABSTRACT: Variant alleles of two promoter polymorphisms in the BRM gene (BRM-741, BRM-1321), create MEF2D transcription binding sites that lead to epigenetic silencing of BRM, the key catalytic component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. BRM suppression can be reversed pharmacologically.(1) Our group and others have reported associations with lung, head and neck, hepatocellular cancer risk,(1-3) and with lung and esophageal cancer prognosis (ASCO 2013; abstract 11057 & 4077). Herein, we assessed risk and survival associations with pancreatic cancer. A provincial population-based case-control study was conducted with 623 histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases and 1,192 age/gender distribution-matched controls.(4) Survival of cases was obtained through the Ontario Cancer Registry. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted, adjusting for relevant covariates. Median age was 65 y; 52% were male; Stage I (8%), II (55%), III (14%), IV (23%); 53% after curative resection, 79% after chemotherapy; and 83% had died. In the risk analysis, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.1-2.0) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.7-1.3) for the homozygotes of BRM-741 and BRM-1321, respectively; aOR of double-homozygotes was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.80-1.53), compared to the double-wildtype. For the survival analysis, adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were 2.19 (95% CI: 1.9-2.5) for BRM-741 and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.7-2.2) for BRM-1321, per unit increase in variant alleles. Compared with the double-wildtype, aHR for carrying no, one, and two double-homozygotes were 2.14 (95% CI: 1.6-2.8), 4.17 (95% CI: 3.0-5.7), 8.03 (95% CI: 5.7-11.4), respectively. In conclusion, two functional promoter BRM polymorphisms were not associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma risk, but are strongly associated with survival.