Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by David Cavallucci
Based on 3 articles published since 2009
(Why 3 articles?)
||||

Between 2009 and 2019, D. Cavallucci wrote the following 3 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Article Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in Brisbane, Australia: an initial experience. 2018

Patel, Bhavik / Leung, Universe / Lee, Jerry / Bryant, Richard / O'Rourke, Nicholas / Cavallucci, David. ·Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. · Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. ·ANZ J Surg · Pubmed #29024280.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The role of minimally invasive approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy has not yet been well defined in Australia. We present our early experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) from Brisbane, Australia. METHODS: Retrospective review in a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing LPD between 2006 and 2016 was performed. Patients who underwent a hybrid LPD (HLPD) mobilization approach and resection followed by open reconstruction and totally LPD (TLPD) approach were included in this study. Operative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathological and survival data were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent LPD including 17 HLPD (63%) and 10 TLPD (37%) patients. HLPD patients were mostly converted to open for planned reconstruction or vascular resection. With increasing experience, more TLPDs were performed, including laparoscopic anastomoses. Median operating time was 462 min (504 min for TLPD). Median length of hospital stay was 10 days. Histology showed 21 invasive malignancies, two neuroendocrine tumours, two intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and two benign lesions. Median nodal harvest was 22. Margin negative resection was achieved in 84% of patients. Twenty-two percent of patients developed a Grade 3/4 complication, including 19% clinically significant pancreatic fistula. There was one perioperative mortality (4%) due to pancreatic fistula, post-operative haemorrhage and sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: LPD is a technically challenging operation with a steep learning curve. The early oncological outcomes appear satisfactory. It remains to be determined whether the minimally invasive approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy offers benefits to patients.

2 Article A prospective study of the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with concurrent non-contrast CT scanning on the management of operable pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancers. 2015

Burge, Matthew E / O'Rourke, Nick / Cavallucci, David / Bryant, Richard / Francesconi, Alessandra / Houston, Kathleen / Wyld, David / Eastgate, Melissa / Finch, Robert / Hopkins, George / Thomas, Paul / Macfarlane, David. ·Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia. ·HPB (Oxford) · Pubmed #25929273.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The role of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET/CT) scanning in operable pancreas cancer is unclear. We, therefore, wanted to investigate the impact of PET/CT on management, by incorporating it into routine work-up. METHODS: This was a single-institution prospective study. Patients with suspected and potentially operable pancreas, distal bile duct or ampullary carcinomas underwent PET/CT in addition to routine work-up. The frequency that PET/CT changed the treatment plan or prompted other investigations was determined. The distribution of standard uptake values (SUV) among primary tumours, and adjacent to biliary stents was characterised. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were recruited. The surgical plan was abandoned in 9 (16%; 95% CI: 6-26) patients as a result of PET/CT identified metastases. In four patients, metastases were missed and seven were inoperable at surgery, not predicted by PET/CT. Unexpected FDG uptake resulted in seven additional investigations, of which two were useful. Among primary pancreatic cancers, a median SUV was 4.9 (range 2-12.1). SUV was highest around the biliary stent in 17 out of 28 cases. PET/CT detected metastases in five patients whose primary pancreatic tumours demonstrated mild to moderate avidity (SUV < 5). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT in potentially operable pancreas cancer has limitations. However, as a result of its ability to detect metastases, PET/CT scanning is a useful tool in the selection of such patients for surgery.

3 Article Planned versus unplanned portal vein resections during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. 2013

Kim, P T W / Wei, A C / Atenafu, E G / Cavallucci, D / Cleary, S P / Moulton, C-A / Greig, P D / Gallinger, S / Serra, S / McGilvray, I D. ·Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ·Br J Surg · Pubmed #23939847.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The management of portal vein (PV) involvement by pancreatic adenocarcinoma during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of unplanned and planned PV resections as part of PD. METHODS: An analysis of PD over 11 years was performed. Patients who had undergone PV resection (PV-PD) were identified, and categorized into those who had undergone planned or unplanned resection. Postoperative and oncological outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 249 patients who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 66 (26·5 per cent) had PV-PD, including 27 (41 per cent) planned and 39 (59 per cent) unplanned PV resections. Twenty-five of 27 planned PV resections were circumferential PV-PD, whereas 25 of 39 unplanned PV resections were partial PV-PD. Planned PV resections were performed in slightly younger patients (mean(s.d.) 60(9) versus 65(10) years; P = 0·031), and associated with longer operating times (mean(s.d.) 602(131) versus 458(83) min; P < 0·001) and more major complications (26 versus 5 per cent; P = 0·026). Planned PV resections were associated with a lower rate of positive margins (4 versus 44 per cent; P < 0·001) despite being carried out for larger tumours (mean(s.d.) 3·9(1·4) versus 2·9(1·0) cm; P = 0·002). There was no difference in survival between the two groups (P = 0·998). On multivariable analysis, margin status was a significant predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Although planned PV resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were associated with higher rates of postoperative morbidity than unplanned resections, R0 resection rates were better.