Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms: HELP
Articles by Luca Cardinali
Based on 3 articles published since 2010
(Why 3 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, L. Cardinali wrote the following 3 articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Review Systematic review of active surveillance versus surgical management of asymptomatic small non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. 2017

Partelli, S / Cirocchi, R / Crippa, S / Cardinali, L / Fendrich, V / Bartsch, D K / Falconi, M. ·Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 'Vita-Salute' University, Milan, Italy. · Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ancona, Italy. · Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany. ·Br J Surg · Pubmed #27706803.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The incidence of asymptomatic, sporadic, small non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PNENs) has increased in recent decades. Conservative treatment has been advocated for these tumours. The aim of this study was systematically to evaluate the literature on active surveillance and to compare this with surgical management for asymptomatic sporadic small NF-PNENs. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies that compared the active surveillance of asymptomatic, sporadic, small NF-PNENs with surgical management. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. RESULTS: After screening 3915 records, five retrospective studies with a total of 540 patients were included. Of these, 327 patients (60·6 per cent) underwent active surveillance and 213 (39·4 per cent) had surgery. There was wide variation in the tumour diameter threshold considered as inclusion criterion (2 cm to any size). The median length of follow-up ranged from 28 to 45 months. Measurable tumour growth was observed in 0-51·0 per cent of patients. Overall, 46 patients (14·1 per cent) underwent pancreatic resection after initial conservative treatment. In most patients the reason was an increase in tumour size (19 of 46). There were no disease-related deaths in the active surveillance group in any of the studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that active surveillance of patients affected by sporadic, small, asymptomatic NF-PNENs may be a good alternative to surgical treatment.

2 Review Management of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas (WHO G3): A tailored approach between proliferation and morphology. 2016

Crippa, Stefano / Partelli, Stefano / Belfiori, Giulio / Palucci, Marco / Muffatti, Francesca / Adamenko, Olga / Cardinali, Luca / Doglioni, Claudio / Zamboni, Giuseppe / Falconi, Massimo. ·Stefano Crippa, Stefano Partelli, Marco Palucci, Francesca Muffatti, Olga Adamenko, Massimo Falconi, Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita e Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy. ·World J Gastroenterol · Pubmed #28018101.

ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) of the pancreas are defined by a mitotic count > 20 mitoses/10 high power fields and/or Ki67 index > 20%, and included all the tumors previously classified as poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas. These latter are aggressive malignancies with a high propensity for distant metastases and poor prognosis, and they can be further divided into small- and large-cell subtypes. However in the NEC category are included also neuroendocrine tumors with a well differentiated morphology but ki67 index > 20%. This category is associated with better prognosis and does not significantly respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which represents the gold standard therapeutic approach for poorly differentiated NEC. In this review, the differences between well differentiated and poorly differentiated NEC are discussed considering both pathology, imaging features, treatment and prognostic implications. Diagnostic and therapeutic flowcharts are proposed. The need for a revision of current classification system is stressed being well differentiated NEC a more indolent disease compared to poorly differentiated tumors.

3 Review Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: State of the art. 2016

Pecorelli, Nicolò / Nobile, Sara / Partelli, Stefano / Cardinali, Luca / Crippa, Stefano / Balzano, Gianpaolo / Beretta, Luigi / Falconi, Massimo. ·Nicolò Pecorelli, Sara Nobile, Stefano Partelli, Stefano Crippa, Gianpaolo Balzano, Massimo Falconi, Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" University, 20132 Milan, Italy. ·World J Gastroenterol · Pubmed #27605881.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic surgery is being offered to an increasing number of patients every year. Although postoperative outcomes have significantly improved in the last decades, even in high-volume centers patients still experience significant postoperative morbidity and full recovery after surgery takes longer than we think. In recent years, enhanced recovery pathways incorporating a large number of evidence-based perioperative interventions have proved to be beneficial in terms of improved postoperative outcomes, and accelerated patient recovery in the context of gastrointestinal, genitourinary and orthopedic surgery. The role of these pathways for pancreatic surgery is still unclear as high-quality randomized controlled trials are lacking. To date, non-randomized studies have shown that care pathways for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy are safe with no difference in postoperative morbidity, leading to early discharge and no increase in hospital readmissions. Hospital costs are reduced due to better organization of care and resource utilization. However, further research is needed to clarify the effect of enhanced recovery pathways on patient recovery and post-discharge outcomes following pancreatic resection. Future studies should be prospective and follow recent recommendations for the design and reporting of enhanced recovery pathways.