Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Pancreatic Neoplasms HELP
Based on 31,038 articles published since 2007
|||| 40 

These are the 31038 published articles about Pancreatic Neoplasms that originated from Worldwide during 2007-2018.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
Pages: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20
1 Guideline European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. 2018

Anonymous2671172. · ·Gut · Pubmed #29574408.

ABSTRACT: Evidence-based guidelines on the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are lacking. This guideline is a joint initiative of the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, United European Gastroenterology, European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, European Digestive Surgery, and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. It replaces the 2013 European consensus statement guidelines on PCN. European and non-European experts performed systematic reviews and used GRADE methodology to answer relevant clinical questions on nine topics (biomarkers, radiology, endoscopy, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), serous cystic neoplasm, rare cysts, (neo)adjuvant treatment, and pathology). Recommendations include conservative management, relative and absolute indications for surgery. A conservative approach is recommended for asymptomatic MCN and IPMN measuring <40 mm without an enhancing nodule. Relative indications for surgery in IPMN include a main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter between 5 and 9.9 mm or a cyst diameter ≥40 mm. Absolute indications for surgery in IPMN, due to the high-risk of malignant transformation, include jaundice, an enhancing mural nodule >5 mm, and MPD diameter >10 mm. Lifelong follow-up of IPMN is recommended in patients who are fit for surgery. The European evidence-based guidelines on PCN aim to improve the diagnosis and management of PCN.

2 Guideline Validation of the American Gastroenterological Association guidelines on management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: more than 5 years of follow-up. 2018

Imbe, Koh / Nagata, Naoyoshi / Hisada, Yuya / Takasaki, Yusuke / Sekine, Katsunori / Mishima, Saori / Kawazoe, Akihito / Tajima, Tsuyoshi / Shimbo, Takuro / Yanase, Mikio / Akiyama, Junichi / Fujimoto, Kazuma / Uemura, Naomi. ·Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. nnagata_ncgm@yahoo.co.jp. · Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center East Hospital, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. · Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. · Ohta Nishinouchi Hospital, 2-5-20 Nishinouchi, Koriyama city, Fukushima, 963-8558, Japan. · Department of Internal Medicine & Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 1 Honjo-machi, 840-8502, Saga, Japan. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kohnodai Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-7-1 Kohnodai, Ichikawa, 272-8516, Chiba, Japan. ·Eur Radiol · Pubmed #28770404.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Recent guidelines suggest that imaging surveillance be conducted for 5 years for patients with at most one high-risk feature. If there were no significant changes, surveillance is stopped. We sought to validate this follow-up strategy. METHODS: In study 1, data were analysed for 392 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and at most one high-risk feature who were periodically followed up for more than 1 year with imaging tests. In study 2, data were analysed for 159 IPMN patients without worsening high-risk features after 5 years (stop surveillance group). RESULTS: In study 1, pancreatic cancer (PC) was identified in 12 patients (27.3%) in the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) indication group and none in the non-EUS-FNA indication group (P < 0.01). In the EUS-FNA indication group, 11 patients (25%) died, whereas 29 (8.3%) died in the non EUS-FNA indication group (P < 0.01). In study 2 (stop surveillance group), PC was identified in three patients (1.9%) at 84, 103 and 145 months. CONCLUSIONS: PC risk and mortality for IPMNs not showing significant change for 5 years is likely to be low, and the non-EUS-FNA indication can provide reasonable decisions. However, three patients without worsening high-risk features for 5 years developed PC. The stop surveillance strategy should be reconsidered. KEY POINTS: • The AGA guidelines provide reasonable clinical decisions for the EUS-FNA indication. • In stop surveillance group, PC was identified in 3 patients (1.9%). • In stop surveillance group, 2 of 3 PC patients died from PC. • Risk of pancreatic cancer in "stop surveillance" group is not negligible.

3 Guideline ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2017

Anonymous2571088 / Qayyum, Aliya / Tamm, Eric P / Kamel, Ihab R / Allen, Peter J / Arif-Tiwari, Hina / Chernyak, Victoria / Gonda, Tamas A / Grajo, Joseph R / Hindman, Nicole M / Horowitz, Jeanne M / Kaur, Harmeet / McNamara, Michelle M / Noto, Richard B / Srivastava, Pavan K / Lalani, Tasneem. ·Principal Author, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: aqayyum@mdanderson.org. · Research Author, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. · Panel Chair, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; American College of Surgeons. · University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona. · Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York. · Columbia University, New York, New York; American Gastroenterological Association. · University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. · New York University Medical Center, New York, New York. · Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. · University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. · University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama. · The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. · University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians. · Specialty Chair, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. ·J Am Coll Radiol · Pubmed #29101993.

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the only possible option for cure. As such, increasingly complex surgical techniques including sophisticated vascular reconstruction are being used. Continued advances in surgical techniques, in conjunction with use of combination systemic therapies, and radiation therapy have been suggested to improve outcomes. A key aspect to surgical success is reporting of pivotal findings beyond absence of distant metastases, such as tumor size, location, and degree of tumor involvement of specific vessels associated with potential perineural tumor spread. Multiphase contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and MRI are the imaging modalities of choice for pretreatment staging and presurgical determination of resectability. Imaging modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound and fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose imaging with PET/CT are indicated for specific scenarios such as biopsy guidance and confirmation of distant metastases, respectively. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

4 Guideline Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. 2017

Polkowski, Marcin / Jenssen, Christian / Kaye, Philip / Carrara, Silvia / Deprez, Pierre / Gines, Angels / Fernández-Esparrach, Gloria / Eisendrath, Pierre / Aithal, Guruprasad P / Arcidiacono, Paolo / Barthet, Marc / Bastos, Pedro / Fornelli, Adele / Napoleon, Bertrand / Iglesias-Garcia, Julio / Seicean, Andrada / Larghi, Alberto / Hassan, Cesare / van Hooft, Jeanin E / Dumonceau, Jean-Marc. ·Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Oncology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland. · Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland. · Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Brandenburg, Germany. · Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, UK. · Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy. · Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. · Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. · Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme & Hôpital Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium. · Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. · Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital NORD AP-HM, Aix-Marseille-Université, Marseille, France. · Gastroenterology Department Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal. · Anatomic Pathology Unit, AUSL of Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy. · Department of Gastroenterology, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Private Hospital Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France. · Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. · Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. · Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Gedyt Endoscopy Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ·Endoscopy · Pubmed #28898917.

ABSTRACT: For routine EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and lymph nodes (LNs) ESGE recommends 25G or 22G needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation); fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles are equally recommended (high quality evidence, strong recommendation).When the primary aim of sampling is to obtain a core tissue specimen, ESGE suggests using 19G FNA or FNB needles or 22G FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE recommends using 10-mL syringe suction for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with 25G or 22G FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and other types of needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests neutralizing residual negative pressure in the needle before withdrawing the needle from the target lesion (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend for or against using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and suggests using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling with FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE suggests fanning the needle throughout the lesion when sampling solid masses and LNs (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE equally recommends EUS-guided sampling with or without on-site cytologic evaluation (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). When on-site cytologic evaluation is unavailable, ESGE suggests performance of three to four needle passes with an FNA needle or two to three passes with an FNB needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).For diagnostic sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions without a solid component, ESGE suggests emptying the cyst with a single pass of a 22G or 19G needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). For pancreatic cystic lesions with a solid component, ESGE suggests sampling of the solid component using the same technique as in the case of other solid lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses or LNs (low quality evidence, strong recommendation), and suggests antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones or beta-lactam antibiotics for EUS-guided sampling of cystic lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests that evaluation of tissue obtained by EUS-guided sampling should include histologic preparations (e. g., cell blocks and/or formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue fragments) and should not be limited to smear cytology (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).

5 Guideline Appendix 6: Cancer of the pancreas: MCBS eUpdate published online 20 June 2017 (www.esmo.org/Guidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers). 2017

Anonymous2241202. · ·Ann Oncol · Pubmed #28881927.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

6 Guideline Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. 2017

Tempero, Margaret A / Malafa, Mokenge P / Al-Hawary, Mahmoud / Asbun, Horacio / Bain, Andrew / Behrman, Stephen W / Benson, Al B / Binder, Ellen / Cardin, Dana B / Cha, Charles / Chiorean, E Gabriela / Chung, Vincent / Czito, Brian / Dillhoff, Mary / Dotan, Efrat / Ferrone, Cristina R / Hardacre, Jeffrey / Hawkins, William G / Herman, Joseph / Ko, Andrew H / Komanduri, Srinadh / Koong, Albert / LoConte, Noelle / Lowy, Andrew M / Moravek, Cassadie / Nakakura, Eric K / O'Reilly, Eileen M / Obando, Jorge / Reddy, Sushanth / Scaife, Courtney / Thayer, Sarah / Weekes, Colin D / Wolff, Robert A / Wolpin, Brian M / Burns, Jennifer / Darlow, Susan. · ·J Natl Compr Canc Netw · Pubmed #28784865.

ABSTRACT: Ductal adenocarcinoma and its variants account for most pancreatic malignancies. High-quality multiphase imaging can help to preoperatively distinguish between patients eligible for resection with curative intent and those with unresectable disease. Systemic therapy is used in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant pancreatic cancer setting, as well as in the management of locally advanced unresectable and metastatic disease. Clinical trials are critical for making progress in treatment of pancreatic cancer. The NCCN Guidelines for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma focus on diagnosis and treatment with systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection.

7 Guideline Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (recommended by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours). 2017

Kos-Kudła, Beata / Blicharz-Dorniak, Jolanta / Strzelczyk, Janusz / Bałdys-Waligórska, Agata / Bednarczuk, Tomasz / Bolanowski, Marek / Boratyn-Nowicka, Agnieszka / Borowska, Małgorzata / Cichocki, Andrzej / Ćwikła, Jarosław B / Falconi, Massimo / Foltyn, Wanda / Handkiewicz-Junak, Daria / Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Alicja / Jarząb, Barbara / Junik, Roman / Kajdaniuk, Dariusz / Kamiński, Grzegorz / Kolasińska-Ćwikła, Agnieszka / Kowalska, Aldona / Król, Robert / Królicki, Leszek / Krzakowski, Maciej / Kunikowska, Jolanta / Kuśnierz, Katarzyna / Lampe, Paweł / Lange, Dariusz / Lewczuk-Myślicka, Anna / Lewiński, Andrzej / Lipiński, Michał / Londzin-Olesik, Magdalena / Marek, Bogdan / Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna / Nawrocki, Sergiusz / Nowakowska-Duława, Ewa / Pilch-Kowalczyk, Joanna / Rosiek, Violetta / Ruchała, Marek / Siemińska, Lucyna / Sowa-Staszczak, Anna / Starzyńska, Teresa / Steinhof-Radwańska, Katarzyna / Sworczak, Krzysztof / Syrenicz, Anhelli / Szawłowski, Andrzej / Szczepkowski, Marek / Wachuła, Ewa / Zajęcki, Wojciech / Zemczak, Anna / Zgliczyński, Wojciech / Zieniewicz, Krzysztof. ·Klinika Endokrynologii i Nowotworów Neuroendokrynnych, Katedra Patofizjologii i Endokrynologii, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny. endoklin@sum.edu.pl. ·Endokrynol Pol · Pubmed #28597909.

ABSTRACT: Progress in the diagnostics and therapy of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), the published results of new randomised clinical trials, and the new guidelines issued by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) have led the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours to update the 2013 guidelines regarding management of these neoplasms. We present the general recommendations for the management of NENs, developed by experts during the Third Round Table Conference - Diagnostics and therapy of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Polish recommendations in view of current European recommenda-tions, which took place in December 2016 in Żelechów near Warsaw. Drawing from the extensive experience of centres dealing with this type of neoplasms, we hope that we have managed to develop the optimal management system, applying the most recent achievements in the field of medicine, for these patients, and that it can be implemented effectively in Poland. These management guidelines have been arranged in the following order: gastric and duodenal NENs (including gastrinoma); pancreatic NENs; NENs of the small intestine and appendix, and colorectal NENs.

8 Guideline Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms - management guidelines (recommended by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours). 2017

Kos-Kudła, Beata / Rosiek, Violetta / Borowska, Małgorzata / Bałdys-Waligórska, Agata / Bednarczuk, Tomasz / Blicharz-Dorniak, Jolanta / Bolanowski, Marek / Boratyn-Nowicka, Agnieszka / Cichocki, Andrzej / Ćwikła, Jarosław B / Falconi, Massimo / Foltyn, Wanda / Handkiewicz-Junak, Foltyn / Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Alicja / Jarząb, Barbara / Jarząb, Michał / Junik, Roman / Kajdaniuk, Dariusz / Kamiński, Grzegorz / Kolasińska-Ćwikła, Agnieszka / Kowalska, Aldona / Król, Robert / Królicki, Leszek / Kunikowska, Jolanta / Kuśnierz, Katarzyna / Lampe, Paweł / Lange, Dariusz / Lewczuk-Myślicka, Anna / Lewiński, Andrzej / Lipiński, Michał / Londzin-Olesik, Magdalena / Marek, Bogdan / Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna / Nowakowska-Duława, Ewa / Pilch-Kowalczyk, Joanna / Ruchała, Marek / Siemińska, Lucyna / Sowa-Staszczak, Anna / Starzyńska, Teresa / Steinhof-Radwańska, Katarzyna / Strzelczyk, Janusz / Sworczak, Krzysztof / Syrenicz, Anhelli / Szawłowski, Andrzej / Szczepkowski, Marek / Wachuła, Ewa / Zajęcki, Wojciech / Zemczak, Anna / Zgliczyński, Wojciech. ·vml@wp.pl. ·Endokrynol Pol · Pubmed #28540973.

ABSTRACT: This article presents updated diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNEN), proposed by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours. The guidelines contain new data received in the years 2013-2016, which confirm previous recommendations, and have led to modification of previous guidelines or have resulted in the formulation of new guidelines. Biochemical and imaging (anatomical and functional) tests are of great importance in diagnostics, as well as histopathological diagnosis to determine the management of PNEN patients, but they must be confirmed by an immunohistochemical examination. PNEN therapy requires collaboration among the members a multidisciplinary team of specialists experienced in the management of these neoplasms. Surgery is the basic form of treatment in many cases. Further therapy requires a multidirectional procedure; therefore, the rules of biotherapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, molecular targeted therapy, and chemotherapy are discussed.

9 Guideline Gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms, including gastrinoma - management guidelines (recommended by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours). 2017

Lipiński, Michał / Rydzewska, Grażyna / Foltyn, Wanda / Andrysiak-Mamos, Elżbieta / Bałdys-Waligórska, Agata / Bednarczuk, Tomasz / Blicharz-Dorniak, Jolanta / Bolanowski, Marek / Boratyn-Nowicka, Agnieszka / Borowska, Małgorzata / Cichocki, Andrzej / Ćwikła, Jarosław B / Falconi, Massimo / Handkiewicz-Junak, Daria / Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Alicja / Jarząb, Barbara / Junik, Roman / Kajdaniuk, Dariusz / Kamiński, Grzegorz / Kolasińska-Ćwikła, Agnieszka / Kowalska, Aldona / Król, Robert / Królicki, Leszek / Kunikowska, Jolanta / Kuśnierz, Katarzyna / Lampe, Paweł / Lange, Dariusz / Lewczuk-Myślicka, Anna / Lewiński, Andrzej / Londzin-Olesik, Magdalena / Marek, Bogdan / Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna / Nowakowska-Duława, Ewa / Pilch-Kowalczyk, Joanna / Poczkaj, Karolina / Rosiek, Violetta / Ruchała, Marek / Siemińska, Lucyna / Sowa-Staszczak, Anna / Starzyńska, Teresa / Steinhof-Radwańska, Katarzyna / Strzelczyk, Janusz / Sworczak, Krzysztof / Syrenicz, Anhelli / Szawłowski, Andrzej / Szczepkowski, Marek / Wachuła, Ewa / Zajęcki, Wojciech / Zemczak, Anna / Zgliczyński, Wojciech / Kos-Kudła, Beata. ·grazka3558@yahoo.pl. ·Endokrynol Pol · Pubmed #28540972.

ABSTRACT: This paper presents the updated Polish Neuroendocrine Tumour Network expert panel recommendations on the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the stomach and duodenum, including gastrinoma. The recommendations discuss the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical presentation of these tumours as well as their diagnosis, including biochemical, histopathological, and localisation diagnoses. The principles of treatment are discussed, including endoscopic, surgical, pharmacological, and radionuclide treatments. Finally, there are also recommendations on patient monitoring.

10 Guideline [A consensus statement on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of common complications after pancreatic surgery (2017)]. 2017

Anonymous7200905 / Anonymous7210905 / Anonymous7220905. · ·Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi · Pubmed #28464570.

ABSTRACT: Based on the latest update of the consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery, combined with China's actual situation, an update of the previous 2010 consensus on the Chinese experts of the prevention and treatment of common complications after pancreatic surgery was developed, with more than 20 extinguished experts to participate in, following many thorough discussions.This statement included pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, postoperative bleeding, intraperitoneal infection and gastric emptying delay, and a new chapter of chyle leak. Each chapter is defined in terms of definition, grade, classification, prevention and treatment. In the end, the long-term postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery were emphasized, and the application of Clavien-Dindo classification in the evaluation of postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery was highly-recommended.

11 Guideline Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2016 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis. 2017

Yamaguchi, Koji / Okusaka, Takuji / Shimizu, Kyoko / Furuse, Junji / Ito, Yoshinori / Hanada, Keiji / Shimosegawa, Tooru / Okazaki, Kazuichi / Anonymous291201. ·From the *Clinic of Fukuoka Government Building, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka; †Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital; ‡Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University; §Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University; ∥Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo; ¶Department of Gastroenterology, JA Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi; #Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai; and **Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan. ·Pancreas · Pubmed #28426492.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer based on Evidence-Based Medicine 2006 were first published by the Japan Pancreas Society, and they were revised to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2009 in July 2009 and were further revised to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2013 in October 2013. These guidelines were established according to evidence-based medicine. In October 2016, the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer were newly revised in Japanese. METHODS: In the revised version, we introduced the concepts of GRADE - grading recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach for better understanding of the current guidelines. RESULTS: The guidelines show algorithms for the diagnosis, treatment, and chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer and address 7 subjects: diagnosis, surgical therapy, adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, stent therapy, and palliative medicine. They include 51 clinical questions and 76 statements. There are statements corresponding to clinical questions, evidence levels, recommended strengths, and agreement rates. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines represent the most standard clinical and practical management at this time in Japan. This is the English synopsis of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2016 in Japanese, which aims to disseminate the Japanese guidelines worldwide for the introduction of Japanese clinical management of these diseases.

12 Guideline Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. 2017

Khorana, Alok A / Mangu, Pamela B / Berlin, Jordan / Engebretson, Anitra / Hong, Theodore S / Maitra, Anirban / Mohile, Supriya G / Mumber, Matthew / Schulick, Richard / Shapiro, Marc / Urba, Susan / Zeh, Herbert J / Katz, Matthew H G. ·Alok A. Khorana and Marc Shapiro, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jordan Berlin, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Anitra Engebretson, Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, Manhattan Beach, CA; Theodore S. Hong, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Anirban Maitra and Matthew H.G. Katz, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Supriya G. Mohile, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Matthew Mumber, Harbin Clinic, Rome, GA; Richard Schulick, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO; Susan Urba, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Herbert J. Zeh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. ·J Clin Oncol · Pubmed #28398845.

ABSTRACT: Purpose To update the Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline published on May 31, 2016. The October 2016 update focuses solely on new evidence that pertains to clinical question 4 of the guideline: What is the appropriate adjuvant regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone an R0 or R1 resection of their primary tumor? Methods The recently published results of a randomized phase III study prompted an update of this guideline. The high quality of the reported evidence and the potential for its clinical impact prompted the Expert Panel to revise one of the guideline recommendations. Results The ESPAC-4 study, a multicenter, international, open-label randomized controlled phase III trial of adjuvant combination chemotherapy compared gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in 730 evaluable patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Median overall survival was improved in the doublet arm to 28.0 months (95% CI, 23.5 to 31.5 months) versus 25.5 months (95% CI, 22.7 to 27.9 months) for gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98; P = .032). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both arms, although higher rates of hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea occurred in patients randomly assigned to the doublet arm. Recommendations All patients with resected pancreatic cancer who did not receive preoperative therapy should be offered 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in the absence of medical or surgical contraindications. The doublet regimen of gemcitabine and capecitabine is preferred in the absence of concerns for toxicity or tolerance; alternatively, monotherapy with gemcitabine or fluorouracil plus folinic acid can be offered. Adjuvant treatment should be initiated within 8 weeks of surgical resection, assuming complete recovery. The remaining recommendations from the original 2016 ASCO guideline are unchanged.

13 Guideline [Recommendations for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of pre-malignant lesions and pancreatic adenocarcinoma]. 2016

Martin-Richard, Marta / Ginès, Angels / Ayuso, Juan Ramón / Sabater, Luis / Fabregat, Joan / Mendez, Ramiro / Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria / Molero, Xavier / Vaquero, Eva C / Cuatrecasas, Miriam / Ferrández, Antonio / Maurel, Joan / Anonymous11460884. ·Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, España. Electronic address: mmartinri@santpau.cat. · Servicio de Gastroenterología, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. · Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. · Servicio de Cirugía, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España. · Servicio de Cirugía, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, España. · Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España. · Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España. · Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. · Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España. · Servicio de Oncología Médica, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, España; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España. ·Med Clin (Barc) · Pubmed #27726847.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical management of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is complex, and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The same applies for the premalignant lesions that are increasingly being diagnosed. The current document is an update on the diagnosis and management of premalignant lesions and adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A conference to establish the basis of the literature review and manuscript redaction was organized by the Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Cáncer Digestivo. Experts in the field from different specialties (Gastroenterology, Surgery, Radiology, Pathology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology) met to prepare the present document. RESULTS: The current literature was reviewed and discussed, with subsequent deliberation on the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Final recommendations were established in view of all the above.

14 Guideline [Radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer]. 2016

Huguet, F / Mornex, F / Orthuon, A. ·Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France. Electronic address: florence.huguet@aphp.fr. · Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69000 Pierre-Bénite, France; EMR 3738, université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France. · Unité de radiophysique, service de radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 75020 Paris, France. ·Cancer Radiother · Pubmed #27523418.

ABSTRACT: Currently, the use of radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer is subject to discussion. In adjuvant setting, the standard treatment is 6 months of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine. Chemoradiation (CRT) may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumors (R1). This should be confirmed by a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant CRT is a promising treatment especially for patients with borderline resectable tumors. For patients with locally advanced tumors, there is no a standard. An induction chemotherapy followed by CRT for non-progressive patients reduces the rate of local relapse. Whereas in the first trials of CRT large fields were used, the treated volumes have been reduced to improve tolerance. Tumor movements induced by breathing should be taken in account. Intensity modulated radiation therapy allows a reduction of doses to the organs at risk. Whereas widely used, this technique is not recommended.

15 Guideline Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. 2016

Sohal, Davendra P S / Mangu, Pamela B / Khorana, Alok A / Shah, Manish A / Philip, Philip A / O'Reilly, Eileen M / Uronis, Hope E / Ramanathan, Ramesh K / Crane, Christopher H / Engebretson, Anitra / Ruggiero, Joseph T / Copur, Mehmet S / Lau, Michelle / Urba, Susan / Laheru, Daniel. ·Davendra P.S. Sohal and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Philip A. Philip, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit; Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Eileen M. O'Reilly, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Joseph T. Ruggiero, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University, Durham, NC; Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Michelle Lau, Community Hospital Based Cancer Center, Tempe, AZ; Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Mehmet S. Copur, St Francis Medical Center, Grand Island, NE; and Daniel Laheru, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD. ·J Clin Oncol · Pubmed #27247222.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts to conduct a systematic review of the literature from April 2004 to June 2015. Outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. Goals of care, patient preferences, treatment response, psychological status, support systems, and symptom burden should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin; favorable comorbidity profile) or gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) -paclitaxel (adequate comorbidity profile) should be offered to patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 to 1 based on patient preference and support system available. Gemcitabine alone is recommended for patients with ECOG PS 2 or with a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens; the addition of capecitabine or erlotinib may be offered. Patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 3 and poorly controlled comorbid conditions should be offered cancer-directed therapy only on a case-by-case basis; supportive care should be emphasized. For second-line therapy, gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX, an ECOG PS 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or nanoliposomal irinotecan should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel, ECOG PS 0 to 1, and favorable comorbidity profile, and gemcitabine or fluorouracil should be offered to patients with either an ECOG PS 2 or a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.

16 Guideline The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic neoplasms. 2016

Anonymous8590868 / Muthusamy, V Raman / Chandrasekhara, Vinay / Acosta, Ruben D / Bruining, David H / Chathadi, Krishnavel V / Eloubeidi, Mohamad A / Faulx, Ashley L / Fonkalsrud, Lisa / Gurudu, Suryakanth R / Khashab, Mouen A / Kothari, Shivangi / Lightdale, Jenifer R / Pasha, Shabana F / Saltzman, John R / Shaukat, Aasma / Wang, Amy / Yang, Julie / Cash, Brooks D / DeWitt, John M. · ·Gastrointest Endosc · Pubmed #27206409.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

17 Guideline ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. 2016

Falconi, M / Eriksson, B / Kaltsas, G / Bartsch, D K / Capdevila, J / Caplin, M / Kos-Kudla, B / Kwekkeboom, D / Rindi, G / Klöppel, G / Reed, N / Kianmanesh, R / Jensen, R T / Anonymous4171110. · ·Neuroendocrinology · Pubmed #26742109.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

18 Guideline ENETS Consensus Guidelines for High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas. 2016

Garcia-Carbonero, R / Sorbye, H / Baudin, E / Raymond, E / Wiedenmann, B / Niederle, B / Sedlackova, E / Toumpanakis, C / Anlauf, M / Cwikla, J B / Caplin, M / O'Toole, D / Perren, A / Anonymous1190854. ·Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. ·Neuroendocrinology · Pubmed #26731334.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

19 Guideline ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Distant Metastatic Disease of Intestinal, Pancreatic, Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of Unknown Primary Site. 2016

Pavel, M / O'Toole, D / Costa, F / Capdevila, J / Gross, D / Kianmanesh, R / Krenning, E / Knigge, U / Salazar, R / Pape, U-F / Öberg, K / Anonymous1120854. ·Charite Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany. ·Neuroendocrinology · Pubmed #26731013.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

20 Guideline The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia. 2016

Anonymous2990853 / Eloubeidi, Mohamad A / Decker, G Anton / Chandrasekhara, Vinay / Chathadi, Krishnavel V / Early, Dayna S / Evans, John A / Fanelli, Robert D / Fisher, Deborah A / Foley, Kimberly / Hwang, Joo Ha / Jue, Terry L / Lightdale, Jenifer R / Pasha, Shabana F / Saltzman, John R / Sharaf, Ravi / Shergill, Amandeep K / Cash, Brooks D / DeWitt, John M. · ·Gastrointest Endosc · Pubmed #26706297.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

21 Guideline Validation of the 2012 International Consensus Guidelines Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Branch Duct and Main Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas. 2016

Seo, Nieun / Byun, Jae Ho / Kim, Jin Hee / Kim, Hyoung Jung / Lee, Seung Soo / Song, Ki Byung / Kim, Song-Cheol / Han, Duck Jong / Hong, Seung-Mo / Lee, Moon-Gyu. ·*Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea †Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ‡Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ·Ann Surg · Pubmed #25822687.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas and to compare diagnostic performances of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating malignant from benign IPMN. BACKGROUND: As IPMN has variable risks of malignancy and management of this entity is closely related to its malignant potential, it is important to predict risks of IPMN malignancy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 158 patients with surgically confirmed IPMN of the pancreas who underwent both preoperative CT and MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the "high-risk stigmata" and "worrisome features" of the 2012 guidelines for branch duct (BD)-IPMN and main duct (MD)-IPMN. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant predictors of malignancy in IPMN. The diagnostic performance was compared between CT and MRI. RESULTS: Malignant IPMN was seen in 8 of 60 patients (13.3%) with BD-IPMN and 44 of 98 patients (44.9%) with MD-IPMN. Presence of mural nodule was the most important predictor in BD-IPMN and MD-IPMN (odds ratios, 9.2 and 7.6, respectively, P = 0.01 on CT; and odds ratios, 5.7 and 13.3, respectively, P ≤ 0.04 on MRI), whereas mural nodule size and lymphadenopathy were significant only in MD-IPMN (P < 0.05). The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for significant findings was not statistically different in both types of IPMN (P > 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of mural nodule was the most important predictor of malignancy in both types of IPMN. Mural nodule size and lymphadenopathy were also significant predictors in MD-IPMN. Computed tomography and MRI showed similar diagnostic performances for differentiating malignant from benign IPMN.

22 Guideline Pathologic Evaluation and Reporting of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas and Other Tumoral Intraepithelial Neoplasms of Pancreatobiliary Tract: Recommendations of Verona Consensus Meeting. 2016

Adsay, Volkan / Mino-Kenudson, Mari / Furukawa, Toru / Basturk, Olca / Zamboni, Giuseppe / Marchegiani, Giovanni / Bassi, Claudio / Salvia, Roberto / Malleo, Giuseppe / Paiella, Salvatore / Wolfgang, Christopher L / Matthaei, Hanno / Offerhaus, G Johan / Adham, Mustapha / Bruno, Marco J / Reid, Michelle D / Krasinskas, Alyssa / Klöppel, Günter / Ohike, Nobuyuki / Tajiri, Takuma / Jang, Kee-Taek / Roa, Juan Carlos / Allen, Peter / Fernández-del Castillo, Carlos / Jang, Jin-Young / Klimstra, David S / Hruban, Ralph H / Anonymous7270823. ·*Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA †Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA ‡Department of Pathology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan §Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ¶Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ||Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA **Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ††Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD ‡‡Departments of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany §§Departments of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands ¶¶Department of Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, HCL, Lyon, France ||||Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands ***Departments of Pathology, Technical University, Munich, Germany †††Department of Pathology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan ‡‡‡Department of Pathology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan §§§Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea ¶¶¶Department of Pathology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile ||||||Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ****Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA ††††Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea ‡‡‡‡Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. ·Ann Surg · Pubmed #25775066.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: There are no established guidelines for pathologic diagnosis/reporting of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). DESIGN: An international multidisciplinary group, brought together by the Verona Pancreas Group in Italy-2013, was tasked to devise recommendations. RESULTS: (1) Crucial to rule out invasive carcinoma with extensive (if not complete) sampling. (2) Invasive component is to be documented in a full synoptic report including its size, type, grade, and stage. (3) The term "minimally invasive" should be avoided; instead, invasion size with stage and substaging of T1 (1a, b, c; ≤ 0.5, > 0.5-≤ 1, > 1 cm) is to be documented. (4) Largest diameter of the invasion, not the distance from the nearest duct, is to be used. (5) A category of "indeterminate/(suspicious) for invasion" is acceptable for rare cases. (6) The term "malignant" IPMN should be avoided. (7) The highest grade of dysplasia in the non-invasive component is to be documented separately. (8) Lesion size is to be correlated with imaging findings in cysts with rupture. (9) The main duct diameter and, if possible, its involvement are to be documented; however, it is not required to provide main versus branch duct classification in the resected tumor. (10) Subtyping as gastric/intestinal/pancreatobiliary/oncocytic/mixed is of value. (11) Frozen section is to be performed highly selectively, with appreciation of its shortcomings. (12) These principles also apply to other similar tumoral intraepithelial neoplasms (mucinous cystic neoplasms, intra-ampullary, and intra-biliary/cholecystic). CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations will ensure proper communication of salient tumor characteristics to the management teams, accurate comparison of data between analyses, and development of more effective management algorithms.

23 Guideline Singapore Cancer Network (SCAN) Guidelines for Systemic Therapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. 2015

Anonymous830855. · ·Ann Acad Med Singapore · Pubmed #26763056.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The SCAN pancreatic cancer workgroup aimed to develop Singapore Cancer Network (SCAN) clinical practice guidelines for systemic therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The workgroup utilised a modified ADAPTE process to calibrate high quality international evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to our local setting. RESULTS: Five international guidelines were evaluated- those developed by the National Cancer Comprehensive Network (2014), the European Society of Medical Oncology (2012), Cancer Care Ontario (2013), the Japan Pancreas Society (2013) and the British Society of Gastroenterology, Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, and the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (2005). Recommendations on the management of resected, borderline resectable, locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were developed. CONCLUSION: These adapted guidelines form the SCAN Guidelines for systemic therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Singapore.

24 Guideline [Guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors--what is new? What should be incorporated in daily therapeutic decisions?]. 2015

Grabowski, P / Hörsch, D. ·Charité, Gastroenterologie, Berlin, Germany. · Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Gastroenterologie, Bad Berka, Germany. ·Z Gastroenterol · Pubmed #26480056.

ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine neoplasias are seldom, but increasing. This holds true for the incidence but even more for the prevalence, since patients are able to live with their disease for quite a long time. The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) as well as other societies (NANETS: North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society; NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ESMO: European Society of Medical Oncology) have published diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines that we present in this review. We aim to summarize those actual guidelines in a practice-based diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm, but also wish to point to open questions that have to be discussed in a multidisciplinary approach.

25 Guideline American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. 2015

Vege, Santhi Swaroop / Ziring, Barry / Jain, Rajeev / Moayyedi, Paul / Anonymous6890824 / Anonymous6900824. ·Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. · Division of Internal Medicine, Sidney Kimmel College of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. · Texas Digestive Disease Consultants, Dallas, Texas. · Division of Gastroenterology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ·Gastroenterology · Pubmed #25805375.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

Next