Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Hearing Disorders: HELP
Articles by Hikaru Tauchi
Based on 2 articles published since 2009
(Why 2 articles?)
||||

Between 2009 and 2019, H. Tauchi wrote the following 2 articles about Hearing Disorders.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Guideline Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010). 2016

Kodera, Kazuoki / Hosoi, Hiroshi / Okamoto, Makito / Manabe, Toshiki / Kanda, Yukihiko / Shiraishi, Kimio / Sugiuchi, Tomoko / Suzuki, Keiko / Tauchi, Hikaru / Nishimura, Tadashi / Matsuhira, Toshimasa / Ishikawa, Kotaro. ·Department of Otolaryngology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan. · President's Office, Nara Medical University, Japan. · Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan. · Manabe Clinic, Takamatsu, Japan. · Kanda E·N·T Clinic, Nagasaki Bell Hearing Center, Nagasaki, Japan. · Department of Communication Design Science, Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, Japan. · Sugiuchi Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. · Department of Rehabilitation, Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences, Japan. · Rinsho Keishin Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. · Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. Electronic address: t-nishim@naramed-u.ac.jp. · Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences and Disorders, Kyoto Gakuen University, Japan. · Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Japan. ·Auris Nasus Larynx · Pubmed #26654157.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The methods to evaluate the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person are fitting tests. The tests include those presently carried out for evaluating hearing aid fitting, and the methods of testing and evaluation have been published as "Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)" by the Japan Audiological Society. METHODS: Guidelines for the following 8 test methods are presented. (1) Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions and speech recognition scores; (2) Assessment of hearing aid fitting from the aspect of tolerance of environmental noise; (3) Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum); (4) Measurement of the hearing threshold level and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone; (5) Aided threshold test in a sound field (functional gain measurement); (6) Prediction of insertion gain and aided threshold from hearing aid characteristics and the pure tone audiogram; (7) Measurement of speech recognition in noise; (8) Assessment of hearing aid fitting using questionnaires. In the above tests, (1) and (2) are mandatory tests, and (3) to (8) are informative tests. RESULTS: By performing test combinations properly selected from the above 8 tests, the benefits of a hearing aid could be determined. CONCLUSION: The above test methods were useful and valuable in determining the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person during clinical practice.

2 Article [Social welfare supporting by daily practice]. 2012

Tauchi, H. · ·Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho · Pubmed #24024265.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --