Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Hearing Disorders: HELP
Articles by James L. Netterville
Based on 2 articles published since 2009
(Why 2 articles?)

Between 2009 and 2019, J. Netterville wrote the following 2 articles about Hearing Disorders.
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Guideline Clinical practice guideline: Tympanostomy tubes in children. 2013

Rosenfeld, Richard M / Schwartz, Seth R / Pynnonen, Melissa A / Tunkel, David E / Hussey, Heather M / Fichera, Jeffrey S / Grimes, Alison M / Hackell, Jesse M / Harrison, Melody F / Haskell, Helen / Haynes, David S / Kim, Tae W / Lafreniere, Denis C / LeBlanc, Katie / Mackey, Wendy L / Netterville, James L / Pipan, Mary E / Raol, Nikhila P / Schellhase, Kenneth G. ·Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA. richrosenfeld@msn.com ·Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg · Pubmed #23818543.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Insertion of tympanostomy tubes is the most common ambulatory surgery performed on children in the United States. Tympanostomy tubes are most often inserted because of persistent middle ear fluid, frequent ear infections, or ear infections that persist after antibiotic therapy. Despite the frequency of tympanostomy tube insertion, there are currently no clinical practice guidelines in the United States that address specific indications for surgery. This guideline is intended for any clinician involved in managing children, aged 6 months to 12 years, with tympanostomy tubes or being considered for tympanostomy tubes in any care setting, as an intervention for otitis media of any type. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations on patient selection and surgical indications for and management of tympanostomy tubes in children. The development group broadly discussed indications for tube placement, perioperative management, care of children with indwelling tubes, and outcomes of tympanostomy tube surgery. Given the lack of current published guidance on surgical indications, the group focused on situations in which tube insertion would be optional, recommended, or not recommended. Additional emphasis was placed on opportunities for quality improvement, particularly regarding shared decision making and care of children with existing tubes. ACTION STATEMENTS: The development group made a strong recommendation that clinicians should prescribe topical antibiotic eardrops only, without oral antibiotics, for children with uncomplicated acute tympanostomy tube otorrhea. The panel made recommendations that (1) clinicians should not perform tympanostomy tube insertion in children with a single episode of otitis media with effusion (OME) of less than 3 months' duration; (2) clinicians should obtain an age-appropriate hearing test if OME persists for 3 months or longer (chronic OME) or prior to surgery when a child becomes a candidate for tympanostomy tube insertion; (3) clinicians should offer bilateral tympanostomy tube insertion to children with bilateral OME for 3 months or longer (chronic OME) and documented hearing difficulties; (4) clinicians should reevaluate, at 3- to 6-month intervals, children with chronic OME who did not receive tympanostomy tubes until the effusion is no longer present, significant hearing loss is detected, or structural abnormalities of the tympanic membrane or middle ear are suspected; (5) clinicians should not perform tympanostomy tube insertion in children with recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) who do not have middle ear effusion in either ear at the time of assessment for tube candidacy; (6) clinicians should offer bilateral tympanostomy tube insertion to children with recurrent AOM who have unilateral or bilateral middle ear effusion at the time of assessment for tube candidacy; (7) clinicians should determine if a child with recurrent AOM or with OME of any duration is at increased risk for speech, language, or learning problems from otitis media because of baseline sensory, physical, cognitive, or behavioral factors; (8) in the perioperative period, clinicians should educate caregivers of children with tympanostomy tubes regarding the expected duration of tube function, recommended follow-up schedule, and detection of complications; (9) clinicians should not encourage routine, prophylactic water precautions (use of earplugs, headbands; avoidance of swimming or water sports) for children with tympanostomy tubes. The development group provided the following options: (1) clinicians may perform tympanostomy tube insertion in children with unilateral or bilateral OME for 3 months or longer (chronic OME) and symptoms that are likely attributable to OME including, but not limited to, vestibular problems, poor school performance, behavioral problems, ear discomfort, or reduced quality of life and (2) clinicians may perform tympanostomy tube insertion in at-risk children with unilateral or bilateral OME that is unlikely to resolve quickly as reflected by a type B (flat) tympanogram or persistence of effusion for 3 months or longer (chronic OME).

2 Review Portable audiometric screening platforms used in low-resource settings: a review. 2019

Jayawardena, A / Waller, B / Edwards, B / Larsen-Reindorf, R / Esinam Anomah, J / Frimpong, B / Gina, A / Netterville, J / Saunders, J / Basura, G J. ·Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery,Vanderbilt University Medical Center,Nashville,Tennessee,USA. · Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,USA. · Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology,Hearing Assessment Center,Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital,Kumasi,Ghana. · Department of Audiology,University of KwaZulu-Natal,Durban,South Africa. · Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery,Dartmouth-Hitchcock Hospital,Lebanon,New Hampshire,USA. ·J Laryngol Otol · Pubmed #30392484.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Millions of people across the world suffer from disabling hearing loss. Appropriate interventions lead to improved speech and language skills, educational advancement, and improved social integration. A major limitation to improving care is identifying those with disabling hearing loss in low-resource countries. OBJECTIVES: This review article summarises information on currently available hearing screening platforms and technology available from published reports and the authors' personal experiences of hearing loss identification in low-resource areas of the world. The paper reviews the scope and capabilities of portable hearing screening platforms, including the pros and cons of each technology and how they have been utilised in low-resource environments. CONCLUSION: Portable hearing screening tools are readily available to assess hearing loss in low-resource areas. Each technology has advantages and limitations that should be considered when identifying the optimal methods to assess needs in each country.