Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Hearing Disorders: HELP
Articles by Jacques Magnan
Based on 10 articles published since 2010
(Why 10 articles?)

Between 2010 and 2020, J. Magnan wrote the following 10 articles about Hearing Disorders.
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Review European Position Statement on Diagnosis, and Treatment of Meniere's Disease. 2018

Magnan, Jacques / Özgirgin, O Nuri / Trabalzini, Franco / Lacour, Michel / Escamez, Antonio Lopez / Magnusson, Mans / Güneri, Enis Alpin / Guyot, Jean Philippe / Nuti, Daniele / Mandalà, Marco. ·Past Head of ORL and Head and Neck Surgery Hopital Nord, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France. · Department of Otolaryngology, Bayındır Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. · Department of Otolaryngology, Ospedale Pediatrico Meyer, Firenze, Italy. · Aix-Marseille Université, Fédération de recherche 3C: Cerveau, Comportement, Cognition de Marseille St Charles, Marseille, France. · Otology and Neurotology Group CTS495, Granada, Spain. · Universita degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy. · Department of Otolaryngology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey. · Department of Neurosciences, Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve, Geneve, Switzerland. ·J Int Adv Otol · Pubmed #30256205.

ABSTRACT: Meniere Disease keeps challenges in its diagnosis and treatment since was defined by Prosper Meniere at the beginning of 19th Century. Several classifications and definition were made until now and speculations still exist on its etiology. As the etiology remains speculative the treatment models remain in discussion also. The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology Vertigo Guidelines Study Group intended to work on the diagnosis and treatment of Meniere's disease and created the European Positional Statement Document also by resuming the consensus studies on it. The new techniques on diagnosis are emphasized as well as the treatment models for each stage of the disease are clarified by disregarding the dilemmas on its treatment. The conservative, noninvasive and invasive therapeutic models are highlighted.

2 Clinical Conference Sudden deafness and neurinoma. 2011

Chays, A / Dubreuil, C / Vaneecloo, F-M / Magnan, J. ·Service d'ORL, CHU de Reims, rue Alexis-Carrel, 51100 Reims, France. ·Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis · Pubmed #20846922.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

3 Article Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. 2019

Zanoletti, E / Mazzoni, A / Martini, A / Abbritti, R V / Albertini, R / Alexandre, E / Baro, V / Bartolini, S / Bernardeschi, D / Bivona, R / Bonali, M / Borghesi, I / Borsetto, D / Bovo, R / Breun, M / Calbucci, F / Carlson, M L / Caruso, A / Cayé-Thomasen, P / Cazzador, D / Champagne, P-O / Colangeli, R / Conte, G / D'Avella, D / Danesi, G / Deantonio, L / Denaro, L / Di Berardino, F / Draghi, R / Ebner, F H / Favaretto, N / Ferri, G / Fioravanti, A / Froelich, S / Giannuzzi, A / Girasoli, L / Grossardt, B R / Guidi, M / Hagen, R / Hanakita, S / Hardy, D G / Iglesias, V C / Jefferies, S / Jia, H / Kalamarides, M / Kanaan, I N / Krengli, M / Landi, A / Lauda, L / Lepera, D / Lieber, S / Lloyd, S L K / Lovato, A / Maccarrone, F / Macfarlane, R / Magnan, J / Magnoni, L / Marchioni, D / Marinelli, J P / Marioni, G / Mastronardi, V / Matthies, C / Moffat, D A / Munari, S / Nardone, M / Pareschi, R / Pavone, C / Piccirillo, E / Piras, G / Presutti, L / Restivo, G / Reznitsky, M / Roca, E / Russo, A / Sanna, M / Sartori, L / Scheich, M / Shehata-Dieler, W / Soloperto, D / Sorrentino, F / Sterkers, O / Taibah, A / Tatagiba, M / Tealdo, G / Vlad, D / Wu, H / Zanetti, D. ·Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy. · Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France. · Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy. · Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy. · Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy. · AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France. · Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. · ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy. · Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy. · Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy. · Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany. · Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. · Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. · The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. · Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. · Department of Neuroscience DNS, Section of Human Anatomy, Padova University, Padova, Italy. · Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy. · Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy. · Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy. · Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy. · Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy. · Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany. · Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. · Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany. · Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK. · Oncology Department, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK. · Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China. · Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, KSA. · ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy. · Department of Neuro-Otology and Skull-Base Surgery Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK. · Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit, Padova University, Treviso, Italy. · University Aix-Marseille, France. · Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy. · Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. · Department of Neuro-otology and Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK. · ENT Department, Treviglio (BG), Italy. ·Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital · Pubmed #31130732.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

4 Article Unilateral vestibular loss impairs external space representation. 2014

Borel, Liliane / Redon-Zouiteni, Christine / Cauvin, Pierre / Dumitrescu, Michel / Devèze, Arnaud / Magnan, Jacques / Péruch, Patrick. ·Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France ; CNRS, UMR 7260 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Intégratives et Adaptatives, Marseille, France. · Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. · Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France ; Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France. · Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France ; INSERM, UMR_S 1106 Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France. ·PLoS One · Pubmed #24523916.

ABSTRACT: The vestibular system is responsible for a wide range of postural and oculomotor functions and maintains an internal, updated representation of the position and movement of the head in space. In this study, we assessed whether unilateral vestibular loss affects external space representation. Patients with Menière's disease and healthy participants were instructed to point to memorized targets in near (peripersonal) and far (extrapersonal) spaces in the absence or presence of a visual background. These individuals were also required to estimate their body pointing direction. Menière's disease patients were tested before unilateral vestibular neurotomy and during the recovery period (one week and one month after the operation), and healthy participants were tested at similar times. Unilateral vestibular loss impaired the representation of both the external space and the body pointing direction: in the dark, the configuration of perceived targets was shifted toward the lesioned side and compressed toward the contralesioned hemifield, with higher pointing error in the near space. Performance varied according to the time elapsed after neurotomy: deficits were stronger during the early stages, while gradual compensation occurred subsequently. These findings provide the first demonstration of the critical role of vestibular signals in the representation of external space and of body pointing direction in the early stages after unilateral vestibular loss.

5 Article Cochlear implantation and contralateral auditory brainstem implantation. 2012

Sinnathuray, Arasa Raj / Meller, Renaud / Cosso, Marie / Magnan, Jacques. ·Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Hôpital Nord-Chemin des Bourrelly, Marseille, France. rajsinn@aol.com ·Otol Neurotol · Pubmed #22772007.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Report outcomes of 2 first known cases using a cochlear implant (CI) and a contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI). PATIENTS: Two adult patients with postlingual sensorineural deafness. INTERVENTION: Both patients had unilateral CI insertion followed by contralateral ABI insertion. In 1 case, there was a large left vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing left ear. CI insertion was first performed in the right longstanding deaf ear. Shortly afterward during the left translabyrinthine surgery, a left ABI was simultaneously inserted. The second patient had Ménière's disease controlled initially by right translabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy but complicated by a right dead ear. When symptoms recurred she underwent left retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy with auditory nerve preservation. This allowed left CI insertion and a subsequent right ABI insertion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure tone audiometry (PTA), speech discrimination in quiet (SDq), speech discrimination in noise (SDn), and sound localization. Testing was performed with the following: 1) ABI activated alone, 2) CI activated alone, 3) CI and ABI activation (CI-ABI), and 4) CI linked to a contralateral routing of sound (CROS) hearing aid system (CI-CROS). Quality of life assessments were made using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: PTA was worst with the ABI activated alone. SDq was best with the CI-CROS. Regarding SDn with noise coming from the CI side, the head shadow effect was only overcome by the CI-ABI; however, the CI-CROS worked best in the presence of noise opposite to the CI. The CI activated alone and CI-ABI produced useful sound localization. Quality-of-life assessments were best with the CI-CROS. CONCLUSION: Bilateral sound detection seems more beneficial than unilateral in profoundly deaf cases with only 1 functioning auditory nerve. A CI-CROS may produce similar gains to a CI-ABI.

6 Article Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. 2010

Guevara, Nicolas / Sterkers, Olivier / Bébéar, Jean-Pierre / Meller, Renaud / Magnan, Jacques / Mosnier, Isabelle / Amstutz, Isabelle / Lerosey, Yannick / Triglia, Jean-Michel / Roman, Stéphane / Gahide, Ivan. ·Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France. ·Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol · Pubmed #20860274.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: We describe and evaluate the process of fixation of the Digisonic SP cochlear implant with two titanium screws. METHODS: The characteristics of this implant allow cochlear implantation using a minimal incision, a subperiosteal pocket, and fixation with two titanium screws, without drilling a custom-fitted seat or creating suture-retaining holes in the skull. The fixation system relies on two tailfins for use of osseo-integratable screws, incorporated into the cochlear implant housing. The first version of this fixation system was modified after a case of device migration: the size of the titanium insert inside the silicone tailfin was increased. Data on 156 patients (8 months to 86 years of age) from a 4-year period in 6 cochlear implantation centers were retrospectively evaluated. Ten patients have undergone bilateral implantation. RESULTS: Of 166 implantations, 4 postoperative infections and 1 device failure after head trauma were reported. No cerebrospinal fluid leaks or epidural hematomas were reported. One device migration was observed in the first series; no device migrations occurred in the second series. CONCLUSIONS: The fixation system with screws embedded in the Digisonic SP involves a fast and simple surgical technique that seems to efficiently prevent implant migration.

7 Article Bilateral vibrant soundbridge implantation: audiologic and subjective benefits in quiet and noisy environments. 2010

Garin, Pierre / Schmerber, Sébastien / Magnan, Jacques / Truy, Eric / Uziel, Alain / Triglia, Jean-Michel / Bebear, Jean-Pierre / Labassi, Samia / Lavieille, Jean-Pierre. ·Departement of Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium. pierre.garin@uclouvain.be ·Acta Otolaryngol · Pubmed #20819026.

ABSTRACT: CONCLUSIONS: The results support bilateral sequential implantation for patients who are not completely satisfied after implantation of one side. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of bilateral Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantation as compared with unilateral implantation in quiet and noisy environments. METHODS: This was a multicentric and retrospective study of 15 patients with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss who were implanted sequentially in both ears. The performance of each subject was compared under three conditions: with the right implant activated, with the left implant activated, and with both implants activated. Audiometric tests were compared with self-assessment subjective evaluation by questionnaire. RESULTS: Both qualitative and quantitative assessments demonstrated improvement in speech intelligibility, especially in background noise, but also for low voice intensity in quiet.

8 Article Mucoepidermoid carcinoma arising from the middle ear: a rare histopathologic condition. 2010

Mimouni, Olivia / Sanjuan, Mélanie / Giusiano, Sophie / Lavieille, Jean-Pierre / Magnan, Jacques / Devèze, Arnaud. ·Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital NORD, University La Méditerranée, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Chemin des Bourelly, 13915 Marseille Cedex, France. ·Otol Neurotol · Pubmed #20593545.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

9 Article Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up. 2010

Lazard, Diane S / Bordure, Philippe / Lina-Granade, Geneviève / Magnan, Jacques / Meller, Renaud / Meyer, Bernard / Radafy, Emilien / Roux, Pierre-Eric / Gnansia, Dan / Péan, Vincent / Truy, Eric. ·Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France. diane.lazard@bjn.aphp.fr ·Acta Otolaryngol · Pubmed #20446821.

ABSTRACT: CONCLUSION: Patients implanted with the Digisonic® SP device showed better identification scores than those implanted with the Convex device, with skills continuing to improve over a longer time period. Technological improvements were beneficial in terms of speech perception in quiet. OBJECTIVE: To compare speech perception skills for post-lingually deaf patients implanted with a previous Neurelec device, the Digisonic® Convex, with those implanted with a more recent one, the Digisonic® SP, which provides more electrodes and a faster stimulation rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 implanted patients, 45 with the Digisonic® Convex implant and 55 with the Digisonic® SP. Speech perception (dissyllabic words and sentences, in open set) was evaluated until 1 year after implantation. RESULTS: Patients fitted with the Digisonic® SP implant showed significantly better scores after 3, 6, and 12 months (mean scores: 53%, 62%, and 68% for words; 58%, 69%, and 75% for sentences) than those fitted with the Convex implant (34%, 42%, and 43% for words; 38%, 59%, and 51% for sentences). The improvement in speech perception after implantation for SP patients continued throughout the 12 months for words and 6 months for sentences, versus 6 months for words and 3 months for sentences for Convex patients.

10 Article A middle ear implant with a titanium canal wall prosthesis for a case of an open mastoid cavity. 2010

Deveze, Arnaud / Rameh, Charbel / Sanjuan, Mélanie / Lavieille, Jean-Pierre / Magnan, Jacques. ·Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Skull Base Surgery, University Hospital Nord - University La Méditerranée and Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. arnaud.deveze@ap-hm.fr ·Auris Nasus Larynx · Pubmed #20167445.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Open mastoid cavity rehabilitation should focus on both anatomical and functional aspects. We hereby report the technique and results of a combined strategy to reconstruct the external ear canal using a titanium wall implant and the middle ear using a fully implantable active middle ear device. METHODS: A fully implantable active middle ear implant was used to rehabilitate the mixed hearing loss of a 63-year-old woman, and a titanium posterior canal wall prosthesis was used to reconstruct the external ear canal during the same procedure. The middle ear implant was placed directly on the footplate. The auditory results were compared to the preoperative unaided thresholds and to the amplification of a conventional hearing aid. RESULTS: Following the procedure, there was an anatomically normal external ear canal with a healed tympanic membrane separating the external from the middle ear spaces. The postoperative auditory gains were on average 31.8 dB on pure-tone audiometry, and 20 dB on speech reception threshold. No complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The rehabilitation of the external ear canal in an open mastoid cavity allows for clinical follow-up of the patient, and the implantation of an active middle ear implant provides appropriate auditory gains both in pure tones and in speech reception thresholds.